Back

Percutaneous Auricular Nerve Stimulation for Treating Post-COVID Fatigue (PAuSing-pCF)

Germann, M.; Maffitt, N. J.; Burton, O. A.; Ashhad, A.; Baker, A. M. E.; Cherlin, S.; Shahmandi, M.; Charlton, N.; Baker, A. S.; Zaaimi, B.; Ng, W.-F.; Soteropoulos, D. S.; Baker, S. N.; Wason, J. M. S.; Baker, M. R.

2026-01-02 neurology
10.64898/2025.12.30.25343085 medRxiv
Show abstract

Even mild SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to post-COVID syndrome, 70% of such patients have post-COVID fatigue (pCF). Many physiological abnormalities observed in pCF could be explained by reduced vagus nerve activity. The vagus nerve, central to metabolic and inflammatory homeostasis, can be activated non-invasively by transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS). Can taVNS improve symptoms in pCF? Data were collected from a randomized study including 114 individuals with pCF. They completed 16 weeks of daily home-based active, sham, or placebo taVNS. Data on subjective fatigue, captured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and objective measures of cortical excitability, muscle fatigue and autonomic function were collected. In participants meeting minimum adherence ([≥]1 h/day on [≥]50% of days), VAS and peripheral fatigue improved significantly after 8 weeks of active (but not sham or placebo) taVNS (11.9 {+/-} 17.8 points improvement, p=0.003, N=24). These results support taVNS as a potential therapy for pCF.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.2%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Annals of Neurology
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Frontiers in Neurology
○ 102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Muscle & Nerve
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Brain Stimulation
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
Brain Sciences
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Journal of Neurophysiology
● 302 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
BMC Neurology
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Neurology
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
13
Brain Communications
◐ 166 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
14
Frontiers in Pain Research
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
15
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
16
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
17
Neurology
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
18
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
● 30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Movement Disorders
○ 71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
eBioMedicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Clinical Neurophysiology
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
npj Digital Medicine
○ 118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
eClinicalMedicine
○ 77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
○ 36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%
30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
○ 97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.