MRI-derived lumbo-pelvic angles and lumbar discopathy in adults with low back pain from the Gaza Strip: a cross-sectional study
Abu Mousa, A.; Al Ajerami, Y.; Najim, A.; Alghamdi, F.; Mokbel, K.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine the association between lumbo-pelvic angles (LPAs) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) detected discopathy in adults with low back pain (LBP) in the Gaza Strip and to establish local reference values for LPA measurements. MethodologyProspective cross-sectional study, 200 adults with LBP referred for lumbosacral MRI at two major hospitals in Gaza Strip. 1.5T MRI scanners were used, and Lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral kyphosis angle (SKA) and sacral table angle (STA) were measured on mid-sagittal T2 images. Discopathy characteristics were recorded, and disability was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index. ResultOf the 200 participants (mean age 45.7{+/-}13.6 years; 52.5% male), discopathy was most common at L4/L5 (89.5%), L5/S1 (67%) and L3/L4 (40.5%). LPAs were not significantly associated with discopathy involvement, type or severity, except for SKA discopathy severity at L3/4 (p=0.044). LPA measures were consistent across age groups, though LLA and STA were lower in males (p<0.001 and p=0.008), and obese individuals had higher LLA than those of normal weight (p=0.004). Reference LPA values were established stratified by LBP duration, in acute, subacute and chronic LBP, indicating a negative correlation between LLA and SKA in moderate and chronic duration. ConclusionIn adults with LBP in Gaza Strip, MRI-derived LPA showed limited association with lumbar discopathy characteristics, pain duration or disability. Although small differences related to gender, BMI and a single disc level were observed, overall associations were weak. The study establishes population-specific reference values for LPAs, which should be interpreted cautiously within a broader clinical context.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for disease-oriented Russian disc degeneration study (RuDDS) biobank facilitating functional omics studies of lumbar disc degeneration 95%
- The economic burden of low back pain in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a prevalence-based cost-of-illness analysis from the healthcare provider’s perspective 95%
- The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: insights based on physiotherapists messages 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Major sex differences in migraine prevalence among occupational categories: a cross-sectional study using UK Biobank 91%
- An interdisciplinary outpatient therapy program for children and adolescents with headache - real world data 91%
- Distinct expression profile reveals glia involvement in the trigeminal system attributing to post-traumatic headache 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Convergent validity of a person-dependent definition of a low back pain flare 95%
- Cortical function and sensorimotor plasticity predict future low back pain after an acute episode: the UPWaRD prospective cohort study 94%
- Fear avoidance beliefs limit lumbar spine flexion during object lifting in pain-free adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Multidimensional Data Analytics for Precision Diagnosis of Chronic Low Back Pain 95%
- Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back 95%
- Immediate effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: A factorial randomized trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting radiographic sacroiliitis using deep learning with expert-level accuracy in axial spondyloarthritis 91%
- Complement factor D (adipsin) mediates pressure-pain hypersensitivity post destabilization of medial meniscus injury 90%
- Development of primary osteoarthritis during aging in genetically diverse UM-HET3 mice 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.