Back

Temporal Dynamics of Kidney Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes: Analysis of the Goto-Kakizaki Model.

Castino, B.; Jorge, L.; Santos, A. A.; Bachi, A. L.; Borges, F. T.

2025-12-27 cell biology
10.64898/2025.12.27.696702 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a major cause of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), a complication driven by chronic hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been recognized as a central feature of DKD, but the temporal relationship between mitochondrial alterations, mitophagy, and inflammatory responses remains unclear. Using the non-obese Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rat, a spontaneous model of T2DM, we examined renal mitochondrial changes at 21, 60, and 120 days. Histology revealed a trend toward increased glycation product deposition, more evident at 60 days. Cytochrome C and OPA-1 expression indicated early mitochondrial adaptation through enhanced respiratory activity and hyperfusion, while reduced PGC1- and PINK suggested impaired biogenesis and mitophagy. By 120 days, PGC1- and PINK increased, likely reflecting delayed, insufficient compensation, coinciding with mitochondrial depolarization. Cytokine analysis revealed a biphasic inflammatory profile: IL-18 and CXCL1 were sharply elevated at 21 days, IL-1{beta} remained stable, and IL-10 was elevated at 21 and 60 days, indicating early pro-inflammatory activation followed by anti-inflammatory modulation. These findings suggest that renal mitochondrial dysfunction in GK rats evolves from an adaptive state to late-stage failure, with inflammation occurring as transient peaks rather than a persistent process. The period between 21 and 60 days emerges as a critical therapeutic window in which strategies to preserve mitochondrial quality control and modulate inflammasome-related responses may be most effective.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.