Statistical Analysis Plan for the Dig-RHD trial evaluating Digoxin in patients with rheumatic heart disease
Rastogi, A.; Ghosh, A.; Devasenapathy, N.; Biswas, S.; Karthikeyan, G.
Show abstract
This Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) describes the planned analyses for the Dig-RHD trial, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of digoxin in adults with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and heart failure or atrial fibrillation/flutter. The primary objective is to assess the effect of digoxin, compared with placebo, on the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality or new or worsening HF over a follow-up period of up to 36 months. Secondary endpoints include time to death due to any cause, time to HF-related death, time to first and recurrent hospitalizations for HF, time to new-onset or worsening HF, and changes in quality of life (EQ-5D-5L scores). Efficacy analyses will be conducted in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication. Time-to-event outcomes will be analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, with additional sensitivity analyses including restricted mean survival time and joint frailty models for recurrent events. Quality of life outcomes will be analyzed using mixed-effects models for repeated measures. All analyses will be performed using R statistical software. This SAP was finalized prior to database lock and unblinding, in accordance with ICH-E9 guidelines, to ensure transparency and methodological rigor.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 96%
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 94%
- Sex and racial differences in cardiovascular disease risk in patients with atrial fibrillation 93%
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults at Primary Care Visits: the VITAL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 94%
- High-sensitivity cardiac troponin on presentation to rule out myocardial infarction: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The HEART-GP strategy for ruling out acute coronary syndrome in out-of-hours primary care: a diagnostic accuracy trial protocol 90%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 90%
- The IGNITE Trial: Participant Recruitment Lessons Prior to SARS-CoV-2 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 93%
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 91%
- Anticoagulation trends in adults aged 65 and over with atrial fibrillation; a cohort study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.