Back

Relationship of the Microbiome with Neurodegenerative Diseases: Development of AI Tools to Detect Alzheimer's

Perez-Cuervo, A.; Lacruz-Pleguezuelos, B.; Coleto-Checa, D.; Marcos-Zambrano, L. J.; Carrillo de Santa Pau, E.; Martin-Segura, A.

2025-12-29 neurology
10.64898/2025.12.19.25342688
Show abstract

This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm capable of distinguishing Alzheimers disease (AD) from healthy patients using gut microbiome metagenomics data. To do so, 16S rRNA gene and Whole Genome Shotgun (WGS) datasets available in the literature were utilised. Data was pre-processed and filtered. Then, an initial analysis was done to study classical parameters of microbiome data, such as alpha and beta diversity, as well as to unveil taxonomical differences between the groups that might be influencing disease development, using a unified workflow to enable integration of 16S rRNA gene and WGS data. Neural Network algorithms were subsequently applied to develop the classifier. First a classical multi-layer perceptron (MLPNN) architecture was tested, which showed limited classification performance, particularly in detecting AD cases. These results were improved using a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, due to its better comprehension of hierarchic data like taxa relative abundances sorted following phylogenetic tree structure. In addition, these AI methods were compared with a random forest (RF) classifier, a traditional machine learning algorithm. All models struggled to accurately identify AD cases due to the low number of samples used for algorithm training. Although the RF showed a better performance under such circumstances, observing the evaluation metrics the application of AI to this task reveals promising upon higher amounts of training data. The use of SMOTE, a data augmentation approach, confirmed this assumption improving performance across all models but specifically in the CNN. These results support the utility of microbiome-based diagnostics in AD, but highlight the need for larger, diverse datasets and multi-omics approaches to improve model reliability and uncover disease mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 4%
16.0%
2
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
based on 31 papers
Top 0.9%
7.9%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 61%
6.6%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
based on 13 papers
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Alzheimer's & Dementia
based on 84 papers
Top 2%
5.5%
6
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
based on 31 papers
Top 1%
4.9%
7
npj Parkinson's Disease
based on 35 papers
Top 1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Brain Communications
based on 79 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
9
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
based on 23 papers
Top 1%
2.9%
10
IEEE Access
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.6%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
13
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
15
European Journal of Neurology
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
17
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
19
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 28%
0.8%
20
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
21
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
24
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
based on 26 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Human Brain Mapping
based on 53 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Advanced Science
based on 12 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 14%
0.7%