Assessment of Augmented Reality Glasses for Spatial Tracking and Intraoperative Annotation in Veterinary Surgery
Tipirneni, Y.; Blandino, A.; Skouritakis, C. A.-T.; Arzi, B.; Goldschmidt, S.
Show abstract
ObjectivesAugmented reality (AR) glasses may improve surgical precision by projecting holographic overlays directly onto the surgical field. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of AR technology for enhancing spatial tracking. MethodsWe developed an AR application in Unity compatible with XReal glasses that allowed users to annotate and interact with a realistic 3D hologram of a dog head. Resident and specialist veterinarians were recruited to completed coordinate (distance) and outline (area) annotations under two conditions: (1) transfer: memorizing targets from a computer screen, and (2) direct: seeing the targets directly on the head. Distance errors, area metrics, and completion times were recorded from each participant. ResultsThe mean distance error (N = 22) was significantly lower for direct versus transfer coordinates (2.73 {+/-} 0.79 mm vs. 3.42 {+/-} 1.81 mm). Area coverage (N = 20) was higher (83.7% {+/-} 13.4% vs. 63.3% {+/-} 16.2) and non-overlap was similarly reduced with AR-guidance. Completion times differed significantly between the transfer and direct groups for coordinate tasks (11.2 {+/-} 10.4 sec versus 8.19 {+/-} sec) but not for area tracing (25.7 {+/-} 18.3 sec versus 26.8 {+/-} 26.5 sec). ConclusionAR-guided visualization improved spatial accuracy for both distance and area metrics without reducing speed. The effects observed for specialty, eyewear, or arm length were negligible. However, the level of experience with a cutoff of 2 years did have a significant effect on distance error. Clinical RelevanceThese findings support the utility of AR for optimizing surgical precision in veterinary medicine.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of open-source virtual-reality based gaze training on navigation performance in Retinitis pigmentosa patients in a crossover randomized controlled trial 95%
- Comparison of visual function analysis of people with low vision using three different models of augmented reality devices 94%
- Investigating the relationship between internal spinal alignment and back shape in patients with scoliosis using PCdare: a comparative, reliability and validation study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of Collaborative Robot-assisted Cutting Method for Iliac Crest Flap Raising: Randomized Crossover Trial 95%
- Embodiment of Supernumerary Robotic Limbs in Virtual Reality 94%
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Measurements of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements by Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection 94%
- Great expectations: Aligning visual prosthetic development with implantee needs 93%
- Low-cost, Smartphone-based Specular Imaging and Automated Analysis of the Corneal Endothelium 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Precision in Spinal Cord Injury Research: A Novel Electromagnetic Impactor for a Consistent Porcine Model 93%
- Fully Implanted Prostheses for Musculoskeletal Limb Reconstruction after Amputation: An In Vivo Feasibility Study 92%
- Simulating human foot mechanics during walking based on an anatomically detailed forward dynamic finite element model 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.