Back

Tumor CTR1 and serum copper dynamics reveal a coordinated copper axis linked to high-grade triple-negative breast cancer biology

Shanbhag, V. C.; Gudekar, N.; Yasir, M.; Conrad, K.; Anakpeba-Dinguyella, S.; Suthar, P.; Rao, P.; Petris, M.; Vahdat, L.; Papageorgiou, C.

2025-12-27 oncology
10.64898/2025.12.18.25342516 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCopper is an essential nutrient required for energy production, antioxidant defense, and connective tissue maturation, yet has emerged as a metabolic vulnerability in cancer. CTR1 (SLC31A1), the high-affinity copper importer, mediates cellular copper uptake, and its upregulation may signal increased copper demand in tumor cells. The dynamics of copper regulation across tumor growth, aggressiveness, and treatment resistance remain poorly defined in breast cancer. We investigated whether CTR1 expression and systemic copper changes reflect a coordinated tumor-systemic copper axis MethodsA retrospective dataset of 1632 breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy was analyzed to compare CTR1 gene expression between responders and non-responders across molecular subtypes and tumor grades. Findings were extended to a prospective neoadjuvant cohort in which paired pre-and post-treatment serum copper levels were measured. {Delta}Copper (post-pre change) was correlated with subtype, grade, response, and tumor size ResultsCTR1 expression was significantly higher in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) non-responders than responders (P = 0.0021), particularly in grade 3 tumors (P = 0.0035), with no difference in luminal subtypes. In the prospective cohort, {bigtriangleup}Copper was positive predominantly in TNBC and strongly grade-dependent: all grade 3 TNBCs exhibited copper elevation post-therapy, whereas all grade 2 TNBCs showed negative {bigtriangleup}Copper (P = 0.034). The only relapse in the cohort, a TNBC non-responder, exhibited persistently positive {bigtriangleup}Copper at follow-up and relapse, whereas non-responders from other subtypes showed near-zero or negative {bigtriangleup}Copper (P = 0.011). Baseline serum copper was higher in patients with smaller (clinical T1) versus larger (T2-T3) tumors (P = 0.033) ConclusionsParallel CTR1 upregulation in tumors and systemic copper elevation post-therapy suggest a coordinated copper mobilization program in high-grade TNBC. These integrated retrospective and prospective findings link copper transport to therapy response and tumor aggressiveness, highlighting copper biology as a potential therapeutic axis in breast cancer.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.5%
2
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
13.5%
3
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
5
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.5%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
13
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
17
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
20
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
23
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
26
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
30
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%