Back

Reduced expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor and calcium signaling genes in gray matter is associated with cognitive function in patients with breast cancer

Kesler, S.; Franco-Rocha, O.; Kogon, M.; Braun, S.; Tolby, L.; Nyagaka, R.; De La Torre Schutz, A.; Blayney, D.; Palesh, O.

2025-12-17 neurology
10.64898/2025.12.15.25342306 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive decline is common after cancer, but little is known regarding the etiology of this adverse effect, especially in terms of molecular mechanisms. This prospective study obtained brain imaging and cognitive testing from 50 newly diagnosed women with primary breast cancer prior to any cancer treatment and 53 female controls. Participants completed up to 7 assessments for a total time span of 9.7 +/- 0.92 years. Imaging transcriptomics was used to measure the expression of genes in the brain involved in N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and calcium-mediated neurotransmission. GRIN2A, GRIN2B, CACNA1C were significantly expressed in gray matter in both groups (R2 > 0.094, p < 0.015). GRIN2A (t = -2.72, p = 0.007) and CACNA1C (t = -2.11, p = 0.036) were significantly lower in the cancer group compared to controls across timepoints. GRIN2A declined over time in patients, and this was significantly different compared to controls ({chi}{superscript 2} = 9.73, p = 0.001). Cognitive scores were significantly lower in patients compared to controls (p = 0.002). In patients, GRIN2A were significantly associated with cognitive performance over time (p < 0.007). These findings suggest that gene expression involved in neurotransmission is disrupted in the brain among patients with breast cancer and may contribute to cognitive changes. Our results provide novel molecular insights regarding the roles of non-CNS cancer pathology and treatments in the brain related to calcium signaling and pro-survival/plasticity-related pathways. Our findings also point to potential treatments for cognitive effects of cancer.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.6%
3
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
5
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
9
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
11
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
12
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
16
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
18
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Molecular Neurobiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%