Cognitive and autonomic physiological responses to daily transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in healthy adults
Flanagan, S. D.; Tompkins, R.; Hougland, J. R.; Hazelet, M. E.; Moss, D.; Connaboy, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe vagus nerve regulates autonomic processes central to cognition. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) can acutely modulate executive function in healthy adults, but the effects of repeated dosing, roles of executive subdomains, and importance of sex as a biological variable require clarification. MethodIn a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled, parallel group study, 12 healthy adults (six women) received 10 consecutive days of left monoaural taVNS (VNS) or sham (CON), with a two-week follow-up rechallenge. Stimulation (100Hz; 200{micro}s pulse width) was delivered continuously (online) at rest and during the Eriksen Flanker (inhibition), Wisconsin Card Sorting (shifting), and Sternberg (working memory) tasks. Resting autonomic measures included pupil diameter, skin conductance (SCL), mean R-R interval (mRR), respiration, and blood pressure. Primary outcomes were analyzed with linear mixed models and [S]idak-corrected contrasts. ResultsTen days of taVNS produced immediate and cumulative changes in multiple executive function subdomains that remained evident at rechallenge, with the strongest effects on accuracy. Across tasks, benefits were most pronounced in women; men displayed initial performance costs, but with greater longitudinal improvements. Cognitive effects were most evident on higher-difficulty trials. Autonomically, taVNS increased SCL during and after stimulation, amplified stimulus- and task-evoked pupil responses, and transiently lengthened mRR. Stimulation was well tolerated and blinding was acceptable. ConclusionsResolution of taVNS effects to higher-difficulty trials supports adaptive-gain modulation within executive function networks. The combination of larger evoked pupil/SCR, transient mRR lengthening, and increased SCL indicates that taVNS increased autonomic flexibility and arousal. Our findings identify biological sex and stimulation intensity as potentially important considerations for taVNS efficacy and provide longitudinal estimates to guide dosing, biomarker selection, and trial design. Collectively, the results support continued development of taVNS as a safe tool for the modulation of executive function and autonomic activity in healthy adults.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Human endogenous oxytocin and its neural correlates show adaptive responses to social touch based on recent social context 95%
- Making memories last: The peripheral effect of direct current stimulation on strengthening memories 93%
- Increasing motor skill acquisition by driving theta-gamma coupling 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does Vibrotactile Stimulation of the Auricular Vagus Nerve Enhance Working Memory? A Behavioral and Physiological Investigation 95%
- Tonic and phasic transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation both evoke rapid and transient pupil dilation 94%
- Beta-tACS does not impact the dynamics of motor memory consolidation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive feedback, early sensory representations and fast responses to predicted stimuli depend on NMDA receptors 94%
- Somatosensory cortex and body representation: Updating the motor system during a visuo-proprioceptive cue conflict 93%
- Rhythmic modulation of visual perception by continuous rhythmic auditory stimulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- 5-MeO-DMT modifies innate behaviors and promotes structural neural plasticity in mice 93%
- Electrophysiological correlates of attention in the locus coeruleus - anterior cingulate cortex circuit during the rodent continuous performance test 93%
- Heartbeat-evoked neural response abnormalities in generalized anxiety disorder during peripheral adrenergic stimulation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.