Peripheral CB1R inhibition modulates food intake and metabolic efficiency in obesity independently of the gut-brain vagal axis
Onimus, O.; de Almeida, C.; Bertrand, B.; Castel, J.; Ansoult, A.; Luquet, S.; Gangarossa, G.
Show abstract
Obesity arises from profound disruptions in neuroendocrine communication and impaired central regulation of energy homeostasis. The endocannabinoid system (ECS), through cannabinoid type-1 receptors (CB1Rs), is a key modulator of feeding, metabolism, and gut-brain signaling. While global CB1R blockade improves metabolic control, its clinical translation has been limited by adverse neuropsychiatric effects, underscoring the therapeutic potential of peripherally restricted CB1R inhibition whose neural mechanisms remain insufficiently defined. Here, we show that two peripheral CB1R antagonists, the inverse agonist JD-5037 and the neutral antagonist AM6545, selectively suppress food intake and shift nutrient partitioning toward fat oxidation in obese, but not lean, mice, without altering total energy expenditure. We further demonstrate that high-fat exposure markedly upregulates CB1R expression in the nodose ganglia, suggesting an enhanced reliance on periphery-to-brain ECS signaling in obesity. Using cFos mapping, we reveal that inhibition of peripheral CB1Rs robustly recruits satiety-related brainstem and hypothalamic structures. Interestingly, disruption of the gut-brain vagal axis abolishes JD-5037-induced activation of brainstem nuclei but leaves hypothalamic activation, and the anorexigenic response, fully intact. Likewise, pharmacological inhibition of key vagal endocrine mediators, cholecystokinin (CCK) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), fails to blunt the feeding-suppressive effects of peripheral CB1R blockade. These findings uncover an unprecedent dual mechanism whereby vagal pathways mediate brainstem engagement, whereas hypothalamic recruitment and metabolic benefits arise through vagal-independent signaling. Our results position peripheral CB1R inhibition as a mechanistically distinct approach capable of engaging central homeostatic circuits without direct brain penetration, supporting peripherally acting CB1R antagonists as promising therapeutics for obesity and metabolic disorders.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term consumption of ultra-processed semi-synthetic diets impairs the sense of smell and brain metabolism in mice 96%
- Inhibition of Mitochondrial Fission and iNOS in the Dorsal Vagal Complex Protects from Overeating and Weight Gain 95%
- Differential cell type-specific function of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and its repressor in diet-induced obesity and fibrosis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Restored TDCA and Valine Levels Imitate the Effects of Bariatric Surgery 96%
- CXCR3-expressing myeloid cells recruited to the hypothalamus protect against diet-induced body mass gain and metabolic dysfunction 95%
- GDF15 Is Required for Cold-Induced Thermogenesis and Contributes to Improve Systemic Metabolic Health Following Loss of OPA1 in Brown Adipocytes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- GLP-1 receptor agonist exenatide uncouples food intake from hedonic and anticipatory regulation in non-human primates: Insights from an operant meal schedule paradigm 94%
- Age dependent effects of protein restriction on dopamine release 92%
- Acute, chronic and conditioned effects of intranasal oxytocin in the mu opioid receptor knockout mouse model of autism: social context matters 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tissue-Specific Ablation of Liver Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Induces a Metabolically Healthy Obese Phenotype in Female Mice 93%
- The orexigenic force of olfactory palatable food cues in sated rats 92%
- Reduced Liver-Specific PGC1a Increases Susceptibility for Short-Term Diet-induced Weight Gain in Male Mice 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.