Back

Comparison of Time- and Frequency-Domain Methods for Assessing Brain Compliance in Brain-Injured Patients Monitored With Intraparenchymal Intracranial Pressure Sensors

Ghibaudo, V.; Elhadjene, N.; Percevault, G.; Bapteste, L.; Gobert, F.; Carrillon, R.; Bodonian, C.; Contard, F.; Mayras, A.; Ravachol, A.; Manet, R.; Dailler, F.; Ritzenthaler, T.; Garcia, S.; Balanca, B.

2025-12-11 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2025.12.10.25341990 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionIntracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is commonly used in neuro-intensive care, but its utility may be limited by a suboptimal use. The brain pressure-volume relationship, a potential predictor of neurological health, is now approached using time-domain methods, which can be challenging to implement. Frequency-domain methods may offer an alternative, but their relationship with time-domain metrics remains unclear. This study compares time- and frequency-domain methods for assessing brain compliance and evaluates their real-time usability. MethodologyA monocentric, prospective observational study was conducted in the neurological ICU of the Hospices Civils de Lyon, France, to evaluate markers of brain compliance. Adult patients with brain lesions requiring multimodal monitoring were included. Continuous high-density physiological data, including ICP, arterial blood pressure (ABP), end-tidal CO2, and electrocardiogram (ECG), were collected for analysis. Some spontaneous ICP rise events were automatically detected based on heuristic criteria and used as brain compliance challenges to compare the co-evolution of metrics across multiple time windows. Time-domain (pulse shape-related metrics) and frequency-domain analyses (examining heart and respiratory components in ICP) were computed to assess the intracranial pressure-volume state. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed-effects modeling, adjusting for vasoactive and sedative medications and Spearman correlations. ResultsThe study included 66 patients, with a mean age of 49.16 [38.38, 57.58] years. A total of 518 spontaneous ICP rise events were detected in 56 patients. Our findings revealed that: 1) frequency-domain metrics strongly correlated with time-domain metrics during these challenges (r > 0.8, p < 0.001), 2) frequency-domain metrics were significantly drastically less computationally demanding, and 3) the impact of the heart on ICP showed a significant correlation with the P2/P1 ratio (r = 0.391, p < 0.001) and other potential markers of brain compliance. In contrast, the impact of respiration on ICP was only marginally correlated with these markers. ConclusionsFrequency-domain analyses exploring the impact of cardiac activity on ICP map provide similarly informative value to more complex machine learning-based tools, but with the advantage of being much less computationally demanding. This makes this approach particularly suitable and intuitive for real-time clinical monitoring in hospital settings, where computational resources are often limited. Authors statementInitials: VG, NE, GP, LB, FG, RC, CB, FC, AM, AR, RM, FD, TR, SG, BB O_LIConception and Design: VG, NE, BB C_LIO_LIData Collection : VG, NE, LB, GP, TR, FG, RC, CB, FC, FD, BB C_LIO_LIData Analysis and Interpretation: VG, BB C_LIO_LIMethodology Development: VG, BB, SG C_LIO_LIManuscript Drafting and Writing: VG, BB C_LIO_LISupervision and Project Oversight: BB C_LIO_LIFunding Acquisition: BB, VG C_LIO_LIVisualization: VG, BB C_LIO_LICritical Review and Editing: NE, GP, LB, FG, RC, CB, FC, AM, AR, RM, FD, TR, SG, BB C_LIO_LIApproval of the Final Version: All C_LIO_LISoftware Development: VG, SG C_LIO_LIEthical Approval and Regulatory Compliance: BB C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
4
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
6
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.2%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
8
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
11
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
15
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
17
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
20
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
25
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
26
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
27
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
28
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
29
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
30
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%