Validation of the Behavioural and Social Drivers of Influenza Vaccination Survey in Australia: Cognitive Interviews and Psychometric Evaluation
Sabahelzain, M. M.; Christou-Ergos, M.; Leask, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundUnvaccinated individuals are at greater risk of seasonal influenza. In Australia, vaccination coverage is consistently low among the most at risk groups eligible for free influenza vaccine. To establish an annual national monitoring of the behavioural and social drivers of influenza vaccination, we validated the World Health Organizations Behavioural and Social Drivers of Influenza Vaccination survey. This is the first study reporting the validation results of the newly developed survey. MethodsTwo stages of validation occurred. First, we conducted cognitive interviews and revised survey items based on feedback. Then, we collected quantitative data and performed psychometric analysis, including explanatory and confirmatory factor analysis. We also assessed the association between the survey items and the intention to receive an influenza vaccine using polychoric correlation and used a random forest model to identify the importance of each item in predicting the intention to receive an influenza vaccine. ResultsWe modified nine of the 31 survey items based on cognitive interviews with 16 adults. Based on the psychometric evaluation of 2055 respondents, we identified and validated five factors that underlie the survey structure and aligned well with the domains of the BeSD framework: Thinking and Feeling, Social Processes, Motivation, and Practical Issues. Each item correlated with the intention to receive influenza vaccine, particularly those related to perceived vaccine importance and social responsibility. Only one item - autonomy of decision-making about influenza vaccination - showed no significant association with the intention to receive influenza vaccination and no significant correlation with its underlying factor. ConclusionThe cognitive interviews and psychometric evaluation of the survey showed strong validity in an Australian population. We recommend further validation of the survey in various contexts, with a particular focus on assessing its predictive validity with actual vaccination uptake.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Arabic validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 5C scale for assessment of COVID-19 vaccines psychological antecedents 97%
- Predicting willingness to be vaccinated for Covid-19: evidence from New Zealand 96%
- Psychological antecedents towards COVID-19 vaccination using the Arabic 5C validated tool: An online study in 13 Arab countries 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Implications for public health communications in Australia 95%
- COVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study 95%
- Exploring Vaccine Hesitancy in Care Home Employees in North West England: A Qualitative Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social patterning and stability of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in Scotland: Will those most at risk accept a vaccine? 96%
- The role of incentives in deciding to receive the available COVID-19 vaccine 96%
- Community-based Case Studies of Vaccine Hesitancy and the COVID-19 Response in South Africa; The VaxScenes Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout 95%
- The effect of Health Literacy on COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: The Moderating Role of Stress 95%
- A “step too far” or “perfect sense”? A qualitative study of British adults’ views on mandating COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine passports 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 96%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 95%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and conspiracy beliefs in Togo: Findings from two cross-sectional surveys 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.