Sacubitril-valsartan Versus Enalapril or Losartan at Guideline-Recommended Maximum Dosages in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Real-World Results from the BEAT-HF Cohort
Barros, R. C.; Fiusa, V. C.; Tim, G. N.; Goulart, V. T. V.; Nascimento, C. H. M.; de Moura, G. T.; Guimaraes, A. J. B. A.; Ramalho, S. H. R.; Jreige, A.; Moura, F. A.; de Carvalho, L. S. F.
Show abstract
BackgroundSacubitril-valsartan reduced mortality and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) compared to enalapril in pivotal clinical trials. However, these studies used suboptimal dosages of enalapril, potentially limiting their findings. ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes of HFrEF patients treated with sacubitril-valsartan versus either enalapril or losartan at guideline-recommended maximum dosages. MethodsWe analyzed data from BEAT-HF, an observational cohort of 2,314 HF patients who received care between Aug/2010 and Jan/2024 at six public hospitals in the Brasilia, Brazil. The primary analysis included 254 HFrEF patients receiving the guideline-recommended maximum dosages of the investigated drugs. A sensitivity analysis included 452 patients receiving any sub-maximum dosages. The primary outcome was combined hospitalization or death. Baseline differences were adjusted using propensity score matching. ResultsAmong 254 HFrEF patients (mean age 63.6{+/-}12.3 years, 61.4% male), 115 received sacubitril-valsartan 97/103mg twice daily, 33 enalapril 20mg twice daily, and 106 losartan 100mg daily. Over the median follow-up of 23.9 months [IQR 11.9 - 41.1], there were 70 primary endpoint events (56 first hospitalizations, 32 deaths). Compared to equivalent dosages of enalapril or losartan, sacubitril-valsartan was not associated with significantly reductions in combined hospitalization or death (OR 0.650, 95%CI 0.354 - 1.195, p=0.165), but it was strongly associated with functional status improvement (OR 3.902, 95%CI 1.745 - 8.726, p=0.001). ConclusionThis real-world study wasnt able to support significant reductions in hospitalization or mortality for sacubitril-valsartan compared with enalapril or losartan at guideline-recommended maximum dosages, suggesting that its benefits may be more modest than previously reported.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 96%
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 95%
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 95%
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Overlooked Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmic Events -- A Meta-Analysis 95%
- Mortality Risk and Treatment Disparities in the Chinese SMuRF-less STEMI Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature 93%
- Pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery: a contemporary, nationwide perspective 93%
- Lifestyle physical activity intensity and rapid-rate non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Heart Failure Subtypes and Atrial fibrillation: Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study 96%
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 94%
- Psychosocial distress and health status as risk factors for ten-year major adverse cardiac events and mortality in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.