Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Adverse Events following COVID-19 vaccination among People on Anti-retroviral therapy in Nigeria
Etuk, V.; Omonijo, O.; Sanni, C.; Ijioma, S.; Abimiku, A.; Okpokoro, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccination is critical among people living with HIV (PLHIV) given the risk of severe COVID-19 disease and hospitalization, due to their immunocompromised state. However, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among PLHIV globally has been increasing, thus presenting a risk of continued transmission of the disease. We sought to investigate the rate of, and predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among people living with HIV in FCT, Nigeria. Additionally, we sought to investigate adverse events following immunization among PLHIV who were already vaccinated. MethodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 164 unvaccinated PLHIV across two-large ART clinics in 2023. An interviewer administered data collection tool was utilized to collect data on socio-demographic information, vaccine hesitancy and barriers to vaccine uptake. Among the unvaccinated individuals, we adapted the WHO-SAGE definition to measure vaccine hesitancy, by asking "Do you still want to take the vaccine?". Descriptive statistics, chi-squares and binary logistic regressions were used to analyse the data in Stata version 18. ResultsMajority of the unvaccinated individuals were female (79.3%), and aged 35-49 years (62.8%). Over half (62.2%, 104) were hesitant to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. On multi-variable logistic regression, the odds of vaccine hesitancy was 5 times higher among participants without pre-existing co-morbidities (AOR: 4.858, 95%CI: 1.109,21.285, p=0.036). Barriers to vaccination among unvaccinated, non-hesitant participants included not knowing available vaccination centers (40.7%, 24/59), and lack of transportation to a vaccination center (22%, 13/59). Among participants who were vaccinated, 45 (52.9%) reported at least one adverse event (AE). Most common AEs reported were local reactions (15, 32.6%), muscle pain (13, 28.2%), fever (10, 21.7%) and malaise (7, 15.2%). The odds of AE were higher among females (OR=3.978, p=0.004). Age, viral load, antiretroviral regimen and presence of other comorbidities did not affect AE occurrence (p-value for all >0.05). No serious AE was reported. ConclusionCOVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy rate was high among our study population. Measures to address vaccine hesitancy among PLHIV should be prioritized by immunization and HIV programs.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 96%
- Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine in Pakistan Among Health Care Workers 96%
- Acceptance and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The burden of vaccine hesitancy for routine immunization in Yaounde-Cameroon: restrictive sampling technique 95%
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 95%
- Factors influencing the use of multiple HIV prevention services among Transport workers in a City in Southwestern Uganda 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the level and determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence in Kenya 97%
- Estimating vaccine confidence levels among healthcare staff and students of a tertiary institution in South Africa 96%
- Essential Workers’ COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Misinformation and Informational Needs in the Republic of North Macedonia 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout 95%
- Midwives’ attitudes toward participation of pregnant women in a preventive vaccine hypothetical clinical trial 95%
- Predicting intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 in older Syrian refugees in Lebanon: findings from a multi-wave study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.