Back

The development and validation of long-read ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 nemabiome metabarcoding using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing for ovine gastrointestinal nematodes and the design of primers suitable for its direct application to fecal DNA.

Charrier, E.; Chen, R.; Ammar, S.; Redman, E.; Meira, C.; Queiroz, C.; Gilleard, J. S.

2025-12-05 molecular biology
10.64898/2025.12.04.692384 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ITS-2 rRNA nemabiome metabarcoding is increasingly used to characterize gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) communities. While powerful, current approaches have some limitations in their flexibility and applicability to smaller-scale studies and diagnostic use. The short read lengths provided by the Illumina platform may lack discriminatory power for some closely related species and also pose a challenge for new marker selection and primer design. To address these challenges, we have developed ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 rRNA Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read metabarcoding for ovine gastrointestinal nematodes. Samples from two previous field studies, from UK and western Canadian sheep farms were used. ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 long-read metabarcoding showed strong concordance with prior ITS-2 data for the major GIN species in both datasets, with minor discrepancies for some low abundance taxa mainly due to differences in reference sequence database representation. We also used the PrimerTC tool to design a new primer pair, EC1 and EC2, to minimize the amplification of off-target fungal sequences derived from fecal DNA and maximize the nematode sequence read depth when ONT ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 metabarcoding was applied directly to ovine fecal stool DNA. In summary, ITS-1/5.8S/ITS-2 ONT long-read nemabiome metabarcoding showed good agreement with ITS-2 metabarcoding and the use of primer pair EC1/EC2 should make the approach more tolerant of fecal contamination of parasite material, with the potential for direct application to ovine fecal DNA. Overall, these new developments should make nemabiome metabarcoding more accessible, discriminating, and flexible for both research and diagnostic applications.

Published in International Journal for Parasitology (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.