Back

Sensitive colorimetric ELISA measuring salivary SBP-specific secretory IgA, its application to pollinosis SLIT

Yamamoto, T.; Mitsunaga, F.; Kotani, A.; Tajima, K.; Hotomi, M.; Nakamura, S.

2025-12-04 immunology
10.64898/2025.12.02.691766 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSublingual immunotherapy is safe and one of the most effective etiological treatments for pollinosis. Salivary allergen-specific secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) is a useful marker to objectively evaluate treatment effectiveness. However, saliva samples usually exhibit high background noise because of nonspecific binding in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). ObjectiveWe aimed to establish an amplified ELISA to measure allergen-specific salivary SIgA levels to assess the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). MethodsBiotinyl tyramide (BT-Tyr) was used to amplify the signal in a colorimetric ELISA. The allergen sugi basic protein (SBP) was biotinylated and used as a reporter to obtain sensitive and specific results with low background. This ELISA was used to measure anti-SBP SIgA levels in saliva samples from SLIT-treated patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis. ResultsThe ELISA was highly sensitive and achieved more than 200-fold signal amplification compared to non-amplified conditions. It was also specific for antigens without background noise. The levels of SBP-specific SIgA in saliva increased in patients 3 months after SLIT initiation. ConclusionWe established a sensitive colorimetric ELISA to measure SBP-specific SIgA in saliva using BT-Tyr-based amplification and biotinylated antigen as a reporter. We used this sensitive ELISA to monitor the levels of SBP-specific SIgA in saliva samples from patients with pollinosis receiving SLIT. Increased salivary SBP-specific SigA levels were observed in these patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.