Back

Prognostic significance of natriuretic peptides after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Kushnir, Y.; Barrera, N.; Romero, E.; Alam, U.; Statnii, I.; Tole, M. C.; Bortnick, A. E.

2025-12-04 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2025.12.02.25341522 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundElevated B-type- and NT-pro-beta natriuretic peptide (BNP and NT-pro-BNP) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be associated with worse outcomes. ObjectiveWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association of post-TAVR BNP and NT-pro BNP levels on all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. MethodsSeven retrospective studies (n=4143) were included, with a mean follow-up of 32 months. Lower BNP and NT-pro BNP was defined as BNP <202 pg/mL or NT-pro BNP <1423 pg/mL, or BNP that decreased >40% or NT-pro BNP decreased >30% from baseline, or pre/post-TAVR BNP or NT-pro BNP ratio [&ge;]1. Higher BNP and NT-pro BNP was defined as BNP >202 pg/mL or NT-pro BNP >35,000 pg/mL or BNP decreased [&le;]40% or pre/post-TAVR ratio [&le;]1 or NT-pro BNP decreased [&le;]30% from baseline or pre/post-procedure NT-pro BNP ratio < 1. ResultsThe mean age was 80 {+/-}6 years in the lower group (n=2578) and 81 {+/-}6 years in the higher group (n=1565). Higher BNP and NT-pro BNP persisting after TAVR were associated with a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality (HR 2.85 [95% CI 2.15-3.78], p<0.00001) and heart failure hospitalization (HR 4.72 [95% CI 2.94-7.57], p<0.00001). A smaller difference between baseline and post-TAVR BNP and NT-pro BNP was associated with a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality (HR 2.70 [95% CI 1.87-3.92], p<0.00001). Conclusion[boxh]Individuals with higher natriuretic peptide levels after TAVR have higher hazards of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization when compared with patients having lower post-procedural levels. Natriuretic peptides measured post-TAVR improve risk stratification.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.