Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan for the ECMO-Free Trial: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Gannon, W. D.; Teijeiro Paradis, R.; Prekker, M. E.; Vogelsong, M.; Schwartz, G.; Odish, M.; Nickel, N.; Bloom, S. L.; Hansen, S.; Fielding-Singh, V.; Blough, B.; Owens, R.; Valles, R.; Adkisson, W.; Alvis, B.; Bacchetta, M.; Ford, D.; Gaudio, S.; Jelly, C.; Landsperger, J.; Lingle, K.; Noblit, C.; Rice, T.; Del Sorbo, L.; Stokes, J.; Stollings, J.; Van Winkle, G.; Wang, L.; Imhoff, B.; Shotwell, M.; Fan, E.; Semler, M.; Casey, J. D.
Show abstract
Take-Home PointsO_ST_ABSStudy QuestionC_ST_ABSDoes a daily protocolized assessment of readiness for decannulation from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) shorten the time to decannulation? ResultsThis manuscript describes the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the ECMO-Free Trial, a multicenter randomized trial comparing a protocolized assessment of readiness to decannulate from ECMO versus usual care. InterpretationSpecifying the protocol and full statistical analysis plan before completion of enrollment increases rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of trial results. BackgroundDecannulation from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) at the earliest, safe opportunity would be expected to improve patient outcomes. Currently, the manner in which clinicians liberate patients from V-V ECMO is highly variable. Whether performing a daily protocolized assessment of readiness for decannulation decreases the time to decannulation for patients on V-V ECMO is unknown. Research QuestionDoes the performance of a daily protocolized assessment of readiness to decannulate from ECMO (an "ECMO-free protocol") decrease the time to successful decannulation compared to usual care among patients receiving V-V ECMO? Study Design and MethodsThe ECMO-Free Trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, unblinded, parallel-group, randomized trial being conducted in 7 sites in North America. The trial compares the daily performance of an ECMO-free protocol in which patients who meet safety criteria have their sweep gas flow rate turned to 0 liters per minute (simulating the patient being "off ECMO") to usual care among 225 adults receiving V-V ECMO. The primary outcome is the time to successful decannulation from ECMO within 60 days. The secondary outcome is the number of ECMO-free days to day 60. Enrollment began on September 7, 2022, and is expected to conclude in 2026. InterpretationThe ECMO-Free Trial will provide important data on the effects of a protocolized assessment of readiness to decannulate vs usual care on the time to decannulation and other outcomes among patients receiving V-V ECMO. Specifying the protocol and statistical analysis plan before the conclusion of enrollment increases the rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of the trial. Trial RegistryClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT05486559; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium observational study: Design and rationale of a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study 95%
- Helmet noninvasive ventilation for COVID-19 patients (Helmet-COVID): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial 95%
- Identification of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome subphenotypes denovo using routine clinical data: a retrospective analysis of ARDS clinical trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 96%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Helmet Non-Invasive Ventilation for COVID-19 Patients (Helmet-COVID) Randomized Controlled Trial 95%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: a study protocol 95%
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 94%
- Predictors of successful weaning from Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 94%
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome and shunt detection with bubble studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.