Back

Integrative Transcriptomics and Phytochemical Screening Reveal Pratenol B, Eriodictyol, Losbanine, and Isookanin, as Potential EGFR and HRAS Inhibitors in Indian Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

Behara, S.; Yadav, U.; Sahu, V. K.; Nagar, S.; Basu, S.; Gupta, S.; Rudagi, B. M.; Kheur, S.; Davray, D.; Sur, S.

2025-12-02 cancer biology
10.64898/2025.11.28.691262 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common head and neck cancer, with India contributing nearly one-third of the global cases. Management of OSCC remains difficult due to increasing risk factors, limited therapeutic options, severe side effects, and rising drug resistance. Therefore, novel and safer treatment strategies are urgently needed. This study explores the potential of phytochemicals as targeted inhibitors of key dysregulated biomarkers in Indian OSCC patients. RNA sequencing and pathway analysis revealed significant alterations in the MAPK signaling pathway, highlighting EGFR and HRAS as crucial therapeutic targets. Given the limited clinical success of existing EGFR-targeted therapies and the scarcity of HRAS inhibitors, a natural product-based approach was adopted. Molecular docking of 17,000 phytochemicals identified Pratenol B, Eriodictyol, Losbanine, and Isookanin as promising inhibitors, with Pratenol B showing dual inhibition of EGFR and HRAS. These compounds exhibited strong binding affinities, favorable pharmacokinetic profiles, high bioavailability, and low toxicity. Molecular dynamics simulations confirmed the stability of Pratenol B with both target proteins, surpassing reference inhibitors. Utilizing vast medicinal plant diversity presents a cost-effective and low-toxicity avenue for OSCC therapy. Further in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies are warranted to validate these phytochemicals as potential therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.