Back

Cognitive screening biases in a secondary prevention Alzheimer's disease clinical trial

Sai, I.; Grill, J. D.; Younes, K.; Winer, J. R.; Cody, K. A.; Sperling, R.; Mormino, E. C.; Young, C. B.

2025-12-04 neurology
10.64898/2025.11.28.25341235 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTIONAlzheimers disease (AD) prevention trials have multiple screening steps to identify cognitively unimpaired individuals with AD biomarker evidence. Cognitive/functional screening tests may be biased in underrepresented groups, thereby impacting trial eligibility. METHODS6669 participants screened for the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimers (A4) study were grouped by ethnoracial background and testing language. Ethnoracial/language differences in ineligibility reason, cognitive/functional test performance, and amyloid positivity rates were examined. RESULTSEthnoracial minorities were least likely to meet eligibility criteria. Patterns of incorrect Mini-Mental State Examination items and impaired Clinical Dementia Rating functional domains differed between groups excluded for impaired cognition/function, suggesting test biases. The Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test yielded more similar exclusion rates across groups than Logical Memory. Cognitive/functional screening biases may impact subsequent biomarker screening as amyloid positivity rates were lowest in ethnoracial minorities. DISCUSSIONBiases in cognitive/functional screening tests may disproportionately exclude ethnoracial minorities in AD prevention trials.

Published in Alzheimer's & Dementia · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above