Back

Complex Emotion Recognition in Neurological and Neurodevelopmental Conditions

Johannessen, R.; Eicher, M.; Hansen, A.; Regli, M.; Ramseier, L.; Hibbert, T.; Sievers, H.; Ruepp, M.; Scheibelhofer, S.; Imbach, L.; Jokeit, H.

2025-12-03 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2025.11.26.25341046 medRxiv
Show abstract

Social cognition deficits are prevalent but under-recognised in neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders. Complex emotion recognition (CER) - encompassing mentalising, theory of mind, and perspective-taking - is crucial for social functioning but lacks a standardised clinical assessment. We evaluated CER performance across neurological and neurodevelopmental populations using a novel digital screening instrument. A novel online assessment tool using muted video clips of dyadic interactions was administered to six clinical cohorts compared to controls (HC, N = 449): temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE, N = 36), multiple sclerosis (MS, N = 64), autism spectrum disorder (ASD, N = 90), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, N = 54), and healthy adults aged >65 years (H65+, N = 35). Reduced CER scores were observed across all clinical groups compared with HC (n = 455): ASD (Hedges g = -1.12, 95% CI -1.35 to -0.88), TLE (g = -0.93, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.60), H65+ (g = -0.73, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.38), MS (g = -0.65, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.38), and ADHD (g = -0.35, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.06). Significantly reduced scores were most prevalent for ASD (37%), H65+ (28%), and TLE (19%). Complex emotion recognition deficits are pervasive across clinical conditions, with the highest prevalence in individuals with ASD, TLE, and H65+. Our findings demonstrate the clinical importance of routine CER screening in these populations. The COSIMO test provides a practical solution for identifying patients at risk of social cognitive impairment who may benefit from counselling and targeted interventions.

Published in Acta Psychologica · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.