Back

The Use of GC-, Codon-, and Amino Acid-frequencies to Understand the Evolutionary Forces at a Genomic Scale.

Elofsson, A.

2019-12-03 evolutionary biology
10.1101/863142 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1It is well known that the GC content varies enormously between organisms; this is believed to be caused by a combination of mutational preferences and selective pressure. Within coding regions, the variation of GC is more substantial in position three and smaller in position one and two. Less well known is that this variation also has an enormous impact on the frequency of amino acids as their codons vary in GC content. For instance, the fraction of alanines in different proteomes varies from 1.1% to 16.5%. In general, the frequency of different amino acids correlates strongly with the number of codons, the GC content of these codons and the genomic GC contents. However, there are clear and systematic deviations from the expected frequencies. Some amino acids are more frequent than expected by chance, while others are less frequent. A plausible model to explain this is that there exist two different selective forces acting on the genes; First, there exists a force acting to maintain the overall GC level and secondly there exists a selective force acting on the amino acid level. Here, we use the divergence in amino acid frequency from what is expected by the GC content to analyze the selective pressure acting on codon frequencies in the three kingdoms of life. We find four major selective forces; First, the frequency of serine is lower than expected in all genomes, but most in prokaryotes. Secondly, there exist a selective pressure acting to balance positively and negatively charged amino acids, which results in a reduction of arginine and negatively charged amino acids. This results in a reduction of arginine and all the negatively charged amino acids. Thirdly, the frequency of the hydrophobic residues encoded by a T in the second codon position does not change with GC. Their frequency is lower in eukaryotes than in prokaryotes. Finally, some amino acids with unique properties, such as proline glycine and proline, are limited in their frequency variation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.2%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
8
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
10
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
17
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
BMC Genomic Data
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
20
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Mitochondrion
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
26
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%