Back

Scaling laws in spoken language associated with cognitive functions

Abe, M. S.; Otake-Matsuura, M.

2019-11-13 neuroscience
10.1101/841247 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A decline in cognitive functions due to aging has led to critical problems in modern society, and it is imperative to develop a method to predict the decline or related diseases, including dementia. Although it has been expected that language could be a sign of the cognitive decline, it remains less understood, especially in natural conditions. In this study, we recorded the large-scale data of one million words from group conversations among healthy elderly people and analysed the relationship between spoken language and cognitive functions based on scaling laws, namely, Zipfs law and Heaps law. We found that word patterns followed these scaling laws irrespective of cognitive function, but the variations in scaling laws were associated with cognitive functions. Moreover, using generative models, we uncovered the relationship between the variations and cognitive functions. These results indicate that scaling laws in language can be a biomarker for the cognitive decline.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
45.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Frontiers in Psychology
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
7
Communications Psychology
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
9
PNAS Nexus
◐ 159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.7%
12
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.5%
13
National Science Review
◐ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
14
Cognitive Neurodynamics
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.0%
16
Patterns
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
Nature Computational Science
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Nature Human Behaviour
○ 95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
● 17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
○ 74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.