Correcting reference bias from the Illumina Isaac aligner enables analysis of cancer genomes
Cornish, A. J.; Chubb, D.; Frangou, A.; Hoang, P. H.; Kaiser, M.; Wedge, D. C.; Houlston, R. S.
Show abstract
Estimating the fraction of cancer cells with individual somatic mutations is central to many analyses in cancer genomics, including characterisation of clonal architecture and timing of mutational events. Estimation of these cancer cell fractions (CCFs) is contingent on unbiased assessment of the fraction of reads supporting variant alleles (VAFs). We demonstrate that VAFs computed by the Illumina Isaac pipeline, used in many large-scale sequencing projects including The 100,000 Genomes Project, are biased by the preferential soft clipping of reads supporting non-reference alleles (semi-aligned reads). We show that these biased VAFs can have deleterious effects on downstream analyses reliant on unbiased CCF estimates. While Isaac bias can be corrected through realignment with alternative parameters, this is computationally intensive. We therefore developed FixVAF, a tool for removing bias introduced by soft clipping of semi-aligned reads, facilitating downstream analyses without the need for realignment. FixVAF is freely available at https://github.com/danchubb/FixVAF.\n\nContactalex.cornish@icr.ac.uk or daniel.chubb@icr.ac.uk.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Generating realistic null hypothesis of cancer mutational landscapes using SigProfilerSimulator 94%
- cDNA-detector: Detection and removal of cDNA contamination in DNA sequencing libraries 93%
- Sensitive detection of circular DNA at single-nucleotide resolution using guided realignment of partially aligned reads 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- CaClust: linking genotype to transcriptional heterogeneity of follicular lymphoma using BCR and exomic variants 94%
- TADA - a Machine Learning Tool for Functional Annotation based Prioritisation of Putative Pathogenic CNVs 94%
- TT-Mars: Structural Variants Assessment Based on Haplotype-resolved Assemblies 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.