Back

Serum proteomics expands on identifying more high-affinity antibodies in immunized rabbits than deep B-cell repertoire sequencing alone

Bonissone, S. R.; Castellana, N.; Lima, T.; Harris, K.; Davison, L.; Avanzino, B.; Trinklein, N.; Patel, A.

2019-11-07 immunology
10.1101/833871 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWRabbits are a model for immunology studies, and monoclonal antibodies developed from rabbits have been sought after to empower immunoassays in a variety of applications. High-throughput characterization of circulating serum antibodies in response to specific antigens is highly impactful for both humoral immunology studies and antibody development. A combination of high throughput sequencing of antibody transcripts from B cells and proteomic analysis of serum antibodies, an approach referred to as immunoproteogenomics, is applied to profile the immune response of rabbits to {beta}-galactosidase (Beta-gal) in both recombinant antigen and peptide antigen immunization formats. The use of intact protein antigen resulted in observing 56.3% more heavy chains CDR3s in serum than immunization with peptide antigens. Additionally, sampling peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for B-cell repertoire sequencing at different time points throughout the immunization was found to capture 47.8%-72.8% of total proteomically observed heavy chain CDR3s, and would serve well in replacing sequencing the B cell rich, but more difficult to access spleen or bone marrow compartments. Despite B-cell repertoire sequencing to depths of 2M to 10M reads, we found proteomic evidence supporting at least 10% of serum antibodies are still missed. Further improvements to proteomic analysis techniques would enable more precise characterization of antibodies circulating in serum and determine antibody protein sequences missed by repertoire sequencing.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.