Back

Efficacy of Lumefantrine against piperaquine resistant Plasmodium berghei parasites is selectively restored by probenecid, verapamil, and cyproheptadine through ferredoxin NADP+-reductase and cysteine desulfurase

Bara, F. D.; Ndungu, L.; Onchieku, N. M.; Irungu, B.; Karou, S. D.; Kimani, F.; Matoke-Muhia, D.; Mwitari, P.; Magoma, G.; Nzila, A.; Kiboi, D.

2019-11-06 genomics
10.1101/833145 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chemotherapy remains central in the control of malaria; however, resistance has consistently thwarted these efforts. Currently, lumefantrine (LM), and piperaquine (PQ) drugs, are essential components in the mainstay artemisinin-based therapies used for the treatment of malaria globally. Using LM and PQ-resistant Plasmodium berghei, we measured the effect of known chemosensitizers: probenecid, verapamil, or cyproheptadine on the activity of LM or PQ. Using PlasmoGEM vectors, we then evaluated the impact of deleting cysteine desulfurase (SufS) or over-expressing Ferredoxin NADP+ reductase (FNR), genes that mediate drug action. Our data showed that, only cyproheptadine at 5mgkg-1 restored LM activity by above 65% against the LM-resistant parasites (LMR) but failed to reinstate PQ activity against the PQ-resistant parasites (PQR). Whereas the PQR had lost significant susceptibility to LM, the three chemosensitizers; cyproheptadine, probenecid, and verapamil, restored LM potency against the PQR by above 70%, 60%, and 55% respectively. We thus focused on LM resistance in PQR. Deletion of the SufS or overexpression of the FNR genes in the PQR abolished the impact of the chemosensitizers on the LM activity, and restored the susceptibility of the PQR parasites to LM. Taken together, we demonstrate the association between SufS or FNR genes with the action of LM and chemosensitizers in PQR parasites. There is, however, need to interrogate the impact of the chemosensitizers and the role of SufS or FNR genes on LM action in the human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.