A Multimodal and Integrated Approach to Interrogate Human Kidney Biopsies with Rigor and Reproducibility: The Kidney Precision Medicine Project
El-Achkar, T. M.; Eadon, M. T.; Menon, R.; Lake, B. B.; Sigdel, T. K.; Alexandrov, T.; Parikh, S.; Zhang, G.; Dobi, D.; Dunn, K. W.; Otto, E. A.; Anderton, C. R.; Carson, J. M.; Luo, J.; Park, C.; Hamidi, H.; Zhou, J.; Hoover, P.; Schroeder, A.; Joanes, M.; Azeloglu, E.; Sealfon, R.; Winfree, S.; Steck, B.; He, Y.; D'Agati, V. D.; Iyengar, R.; Troyanskaya, O. G.; Barisoni, L.; Gaut, J.; Zhang, K.; Laszik, Z.; Rovin, B.; Dagher, P. C.; Sharma, K.; Sarwal, M.; Hodgin, J. B.; Alpers, C. E.; Kretzler, M.; Jain, S.; For the Kidney Precision Medicine Project,
Show abstract
Comprehensive and spatially mapped molecular atlases of organs at a cellular level are a critical resource to gain insights into pathogenic mechanisms and personalized therapies for diseases. The Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP) is an endeavor to generate 3-dimensional (3D) molecular atlases of healthy and diseased kidney biopsies using multiple state-of-the-art OMICS and imaging technologies across several institutions. Obtaining rigorous and reproducible results from disparate methods and at different sites to interrogate biomolecules at a single cell level or in 3D space is a significant challenge that can be a futile exercise if not well controlled. We describe a "follow the tissue" pipeline for generating a reliable and authentic single cell/region 3D molecular atlas of human adult kidney. Our approach emphasizes quality assurance, quality control, validation and harmonization across different OMICS and imaging technologies from sample procurement, processing, storage, shipping to data generation, analysis and sharing. We established benchmarks for quality control, rigor, reproducibility and feasibility across multiple technologies through a pilot experiment using common source tissue that was processed and analyzed at different institutions and different technologies. A peer review system was established to critically review quality control measures and the reproducibility of data generated by each technology before being approved to interrogate clinical biopsy specimens. The process established economizes the use of valuable biopsy tissue for multi-OMICS and imaging analysis with stringent quality control to ensure rigor and reproducibility of results and serves as a model for precision medicine projects across laboratories, institutions and consortia.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of infiltrating fibroblasts by single-cell transcriptomics in human kidney allografts 91%
- Pixelwise H-score: a novel digital image analysis based-metric to quantify membrane biomarker expression from immunohistochemistry images 91%
- LIMPACAT : Multi-Omics Attention Transformer for Immune Prediction in Liver Cancer Using Whole-Slide Imaging 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Benchmark of state-of-the-art Deconvolution Methods in Spatial Transcriptomics: Insights from Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease 90%
- Predicting GD2 expression across cancer types by the integration of pathway topology and transcriptome data 88%
- Automated Segmentation of Hepatic Vessels and Lobules in Whole-Slide Images Using U-Net Models 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI for IACUC: Accurate Initial Assessment of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Protocols 86%
- Characterization of A Bronchoscopically Induced Transgenic Lung Cancer Pig Model for Human Translatability 85%
- PREMISE: A database of 20 Macaca Fascicularis PET/MRI brain imaging available for research 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extent, impact, and mitigation of batch effects in tumor biomarker studies using tissue microarrays 89%
- Scaling of an antibody validation procedure enables quantification of antibody performance in major research applications 88%
- Tissue libraries enable rapid determination of conditions that preserve antibody labeling in cleared mouse and human tissue 88%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.