Datelife: leveraging databases and analytical tools to reveal the dated Tree of Life.
Sanchez Reyes, L. L.; O'Meara, B. C.
Show abstract
Achieving a high-quality reconstruction of a phylogenetic tree with branch lengths proportional to absolute time (chronogram) is a difficult and time-consuming task. But the increased availability of fossil and molecular data, and time-efficient analytical techniques has resulted in many recent publications of large chronograms for a large number and wide diversity of organisms. Knowledge of the evolutionary time frame of organisms is key for research in the natural sciences. It also represent valuable information for education, science communication, and policy decisions. When chronograms are shared in public and open databases, this wealth of expertly-curated and peer-reviewed data on evolutionary timeframe is exposed in a programatic and reusable way, as intensive and localized efforts have improved data sharing practices, as well as incentivizited open science in biology. Here we present DateLife, a service implemented as an R package and an R Shiny website application available at www.datelife.org, that provides functionalities for efficient and easy finding, summary, reuse, and reanalysis of expert, peer-reviewed, public data on time frame of evolution. The main DateLife workflow constructs a chronogram for any given combination of taxon names by searching a local chronogram database constructed and curated from the Open Tree of Life Phylesystem phylogenetic database, which incorporates phylogenetic data from the TreeBASE database as well. We implement and test methods for summarizing time data from multiple source chronograms using supertree and congruification algorithms, and using age data extracted from source chronograms as secondary calibration points to add branch lengths proportional to absolute time to a tree topology. DateLife will be useful to increase awareness of the existing variation in alternative hypothesis of evolutionary time for the same organisms, and can foster exploration of the effect of alternative evolutionary timing hypotheses on the results of downstream analyses, providing a framework for a more informed interpretation of evolutionary results.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- rphenoscate: An R package for semantic-aware evolutionary analyses of anatomical traits 95%
- ontophylo: Reconstructing the evolutionary dynamics of phenomes using new ontology-informed phylogenetic methods 95%
- Chronospaces: an R package for the statistical exploration of divergence times promotes the assessment of methodological sensitivity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- BASE: a novel workflow to integrate non-ubiquitous genes in genomics analyses for selection. 94%
- The Neotropical endemic liverwort subfamily Micropterygioideae had circum-Antarctic links to the rest of the Lepidoziaceae during the early Cretaceous 92%
- occAssess: An R package for assessing potential biases in species occurrence data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Taxonium, a web-based tool for exploring largephylogenetic trees 92%
- High-quality carnivore genomes from roadkill samples enable species delimitation in aardwolf and bat-eared fox 92%
- The evolutionary history of the ancient weevil family Belidae (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea) reveals the marks of Gondwana breakup and major floristic turnovers, including the rise of angiosperms 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.