Back

CRISPR/Cas13a signal amplification linked immunosorbent assay (CLISA)

Chen, Q.; Tian, T.; Xiong, E.; Wang, P.; Zhou, X.

2019-09-24 molecular biology
10.1101/781237 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a basic technique used in analytical and clinical investigations. However, conventional ELISA is still not sensitive enough to detect ultra-low concentrations of biomarkers for the early diagnosis of cancer, cardiovascular risk, neurological disorders, and infectious diseases. Herein we show a mechanism utilizing the CRISPR/Cas13a-based signal export amplification strategy, which double-amplifies the output signal by T7 RNA polymerase transcription and CRISPR/Cas13a collateral cleavage activity. This process is termed the CRISPR/Cas13a signal amplification linked immunosorbent assay (CLISA). The proposed method was validated by detecting an inflammatory factor, human interleukin-6 (human IL-6), and a tumor marker, human vascular endothelial growth factor (human VEGF), which achieved limit of detection (LOD) values of 45.81 fg/mL (2.29 fM) and 32.27 fg/m (0.81 fM), respectively, demonstrating that CLISA is at least 102-fold more sensitive than conventional ELISA.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
Similar papers in this journal
2
ACS Sensors
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Analytical Chemistry
● 218 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Talanta
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.5%
7
SLAS Discovery
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.4%
9
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
○ 76 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
10
Analytica Chimica Acta
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
ACS Omega
● 105 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
12
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biological Chemistry
○ 690 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.5%
15
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.5%
16
Cell Discovery
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
17
Biochimie
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Chemical Communications
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
BioTechniques
○ 25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Journal of Virological Methods
○ 37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
23
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
○ 39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
ACS Nano
● 113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Diagnostics
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Lab on a Chip
● 96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Analytical Biochemistry
○ 26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Microbiology Spectrum
● 469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
30
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.