Back

Inhibition of Microbial Beta-Glucuronidase Does Not Prevent Breast Carcinogenesis in the Polyoma Middle T Mouse

Mani, A.; Li, H.; Evrin, S.; Redinbo, M. R.; Mani, S.

2019-08-24 cancer biology
10.1101/746602 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo demonstrate whether inhibition of intestinal microbial beta ({beta})-glucuronidase (BGUS) abrogates tumor formation in a MMTV-PyMT mouse breast cancer model.\n\nMethodsFemale MMTV-PyMT heterozygote mice (4 weeks old) were randomized to oral gavage with vehicle or UNC10201652 (20 g/day), a microbial BGUS inhibitor, for 9 weeks. The entire animal carcass was assessed for tumor deposits by histology and immunohistochemical staining for tumor (Ki67, PCNA) and breast specific (ER, PR, Cyclin D1, aSMA, Integrin {beta}1) markers.\n\nResultsThe MMTV-PyMT breast pathology in our study simulates prior published reports of tumor incidence and aggressiveness. There was no significant difference in the tumor histology, number of tumors (lesions), and patterns of spread of tumors in the UNC10201652 versus the vehicle treated mice. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the semi-quantitative scores for expression of ER, PR, Ki67, PCNA, or Integrin {beta}1. There were also no major differences seen in qualitative screening of Cyclin D1 and aSMA.\n\nConclusionsMMTV-PyMT mice administered UNC10201652, when compared to vehicle treated mice, show a similar abundance of breast tumor (and tumor initiating) lesions ranging from hyperplasia to frank carcinoma. There is a trend, however small, that the incidence of hyperplastic and adenomas may be decreased in UNC10201652 treated mice. Further refined dosing strategies in MMTV-PyMT are planned to clarify its biological significance. To our knowledge this is the first report of use of any BGUS inhibitor in chemoprevention of breast tumors using a genetic model simulating human breast cancer.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.