Back

The efficiency for recombineering is dependent on the source of the phage recombinase function unit

Chang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Su, T.; Qi, Q.

2019-08-24 bioinformatics
10.1101/745448 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Phage recombinase function units (PRFUs) such as lambda-Red or Rac RecET have been proven to be powerful genetic tools in the recombineering of Escherichia coli. Studies have focused on developing such systems in other bacteria as it is believed that these PRFUs have limited efficiency in distant species. However, how the species evolution distance relates to the efficiency of recombineering remains unclear. Here, we present a thorough study of PRFUs to find features that might be related to the efficiency of PRFUs for recombineering. We first identified 59 unique sets of PRFUs in the genus Corynebacterium and classified them based on their sequence as well as secondary structure similarities. Then both PRFUs from this genus and other bacteria were chosen for experiment based on sequential and secondary structure similarity as well as species distance. These PRFUs were compared for their ability in mediating recombineering with oligo or double-stranded DNA substrates in Corynebacterium glutamicum. We demonstrate that the source of the PRFU is more critical than species distance for the efficiency of recombineering. Our work will provide new ideas for efficient recombineering using PRFUs.\n\nImportanceRecombineering using phage recombinase function units (PRFUs) such as lambda-Red or Rac RecET has gained success in Escherichia coli, while efforts applying these systems in other bacteria were limited by the efficiency. It is believed that the species distance may be a major reason for the low efficiency. In this study, however, we showed that it is the source of PRFU rather than the species distance that matters for the recombineering in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Besides, we also showed that the lower transformation efficiency in other bacteria compared to that of E. coli could be a major reason for the low performance of heterogeneously expressed RecET. These findings will be helpful for the recombineering using PRFUs.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
3
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
4
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
7
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
9
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
11
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
50% of probability mass above
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
19
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%