Back

Proteome-wide characterization and biomarker identification of intracranial aneurysm

Sharma, T.; Datta, K. K.; Kumar, M.; Dey, G.; Khan, A. A.; Mangalaparthi, K. K.; Saharan, P.; C., S.; Aggarwal, A.; Singla, N.; Ghosh, S.; Rawat, A.; Dhandapani, S.; Salunke, P.; Chhabra, R.; Singh, D.; Takkar, A.; Gupta, S. K.; Prasad, T. S. K.; Gowda, H.; Pandey, A.; Bhagat, H.

2019-08-09 neuroscience
10.1101/725473 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The scientific basis of intracranial aneurysm (IA) formation, its rupture and further development of cerebral vasospasm remains incompletely understood. Deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying these events will lead to identification of early detection biomarkers and in turn, improved treatment outcomes. Aberrant protein expression may drive structural alterations of vasculature found in IA. To unravel these aberrations, we performed untargeted, global, quantitative proteomic analysis of aneurysm tissue and serum from patients with IA. Samples were derived from patients of three clinical sub groups- 1) unruptured aneurysm 2) ruptured aneurysm without vasospasm 3) ruptured aneurysm who developed vasospasm. A total of 937 and 294 proteins were identified in aneurysm tissue and serum samples respectively. Several proteins that are known to maintain the structural integrity of vasculature were found to be dysregulated. ORM1, a glycoprotein, was significantly upregulated in both the aneurysm tissue and serum samples of unruptured IA patients. We employed a larger cohort of patients and validated ORM1 as a potential biomarker for screening of unruptured aneurysm using ELISA. Samples from ruptured aneurysm with vasospasm showed significant upregulation of MMP9 as compared to ruptured aneurysm without vasospasm. Using a cohort of ruptured aneurysm patients with and without vasospasm, we validated MMP9 as a potential biomarker for vasospasm. This study reveals pathophysiology underlying different clinical sub groups of IA and also suggests potential biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.