Back

Protection induced by anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatment in Leishmania amazonensis-infected BALB/c mice

da Fonseca-Martins, A. M.; Ramos, T. D.; Pratti, J. E.; Firmino-Cruz, L.; Gomes, D. C.; Soong, L.; Saraiva, E.; de Matos Guedes, H. L.

2019-08-01 immunology
10.1101/721894 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Leishmaniasis is a neglected disease, for which current treatment presents numerous issues. Leishmania amazonensis is the etiological agent of cutaneous and diffuse cutaneous leishmaniasis. The roles of the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor on lymphocytes and its ligand (PD-L1) on antigen-presenting cells have been well studied in tumor and other infection models; but little is known about their roles in non-healing cutaneous leishmaniasis. Our previous report of L. amazonensis-induced PD-L1 expression on dendritic cells, in combination with decreased IFN-{gamma} production by CD4+ T cells in C57BL/6 mice, led to a hypothesis that the formation of the PD-1/PD-L1 complex contributes to down-modulation of immune responses, especially T cell suppression, enabling parasite survival and persistence. In this study, we tested the therapeutic potential of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) against a non-healing L. amazonensis infection in BALB/c mice. We observed that L. amazonensis induced PD-1 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and that anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatment significantly increased IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, respectively. Compared with infection controls, mice that received treatment with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1, but not anti-PD-L2, displayed bigger lesions with significantly lower parasite loads. Treatment did not affect anti-Leishmania antibody or IL-10 production, but anti-PD-1 treatment reduced both IL-4 and TGF-{beta} production. Together, our results highlight the therapeutic potential of an anti-PD-1-based treatment in promoting the reinvigoration of T cells for the control of parasite burden.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.