Back

Field evaluation of a quantitative, and rapid malaria diagnostic system using a fluorescent Blue-ray optical device

Mita, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Hashimoto, M.; Nagatomi, K.; Nogami, T.; Sofue, Y.; Hayashi, T.; Ido, Y.; Yatsushiro, S.; Abe, K.; Kajimoto, K.; Tamari, N.; Awuor, B.; Sonye, G.; Kongere, J.; Munga, S.; Ohashi, J.; Oka, H.; Minakawa, N.; Kataoka, M.

2019-07-31 physiology
10.1101/721076 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We improved a previously developed quantitative malaria diagnostic system based on fluorescent Blue-ray optical device. Here, we first improved the diagnostic system to enable fully automated operation and the field application was evaluated in Kenya. We detected Plasmodium falciparum in blood samples collected from 288 individuals aged 1-16 years using nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), rapid diagnostic test (RDT), and automated system. Compared to RDT, the automated system exhibited a higher sensitivity (100%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 93.3-100%) and specificity (92.8%; 95%CI, 88.5-95.8%). The limit of detection was 0.0061%. Linear regression analysis revealed a correlation between the automated system and microscopic examination for detecting parasitemia (adjusted R2 value=0.63, P=1.13x10-12). The automated system exhibited a stable quantification of parasitemia and a higher diagnostic accuracy for parasitemia than RDT. This indicates the potential of this system as a valid alternative to conventional methods used at local health facilities, which lack basic infrastructure.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.