Back

Hormones and the Human Alpha Female

Sumra, M. K.

2019-07-09 scientific communication and education
10.1101/697086 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The concept of the alpha female has become widely accepted as a form of female identity in the West. Though relationships between hormone concentrations and alpha-related traits have been demonstrated in alpha nonhuman primates, this has not been examined in the case of the human alpha female. The present study examined the associations of testosterone and cortisol, as well as 3 other hormones, estradiol, oxytocin, and progesterone derived from hair samples, with 11 variables related to the expression of the alpha female identity in a small non-random sample (N=126) of self-identified alpha and non-alpha women in North America. The results revealed statistically significant differences between these groups. When compared to non-alpha women, alpha women scored higher than non-alphas in measures for masculinity, leadership, low introversion, self-esteem, and exhibited lower hair cortisol levels. Alphas exhibited slightly lower estradiol and oxytocin levels than non-alphas though these differences were non-significant. Similar non-significant differences were also found in the case of sexual experience, sexual dominance, testosterone, and progesterone. Though cortisol was not associated with masculine traits, it was positively and significantly associated with leadership. Cortisol was also negatively and significantly associated with strength and a measure for femininity. Progesterone, testosterone, and oxytocin were positively and significantly associated with enjoying sex, as was oxytocin with playing a dominant role in sexual encounters. Surprisingly, testosterone was not associated with alpha status nor with the measure of masculinity, and estradiol was not associated with any of the variables. The results imply that women who identify as alpha may experience less physiological stress than non-alpha females as measured by their lower cortisol levels.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.7%
2
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
3
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
15
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Antioxidants
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%