Back

Developing single molecule methods for measuring the pathway proteins ERK, AKT, cyclin d and p70s6k in localized colon cancer in relation to mutation status

Olsen, D. A.; Thomsen, C. E. B.; Andersen, R. F.; Madsen, J. S.; Jakobsen, A.; Brandslund, I.

2019-07-08 biochemistry
10.1101/695809 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to quantify the intracellular pathway proteins ERK, AKT, cyclin d and p70s6k in localized colon cancer tissue to investigate the possible prognostic values and the ability to be used as screening markers for upstream mutations.\n\nMethodsColon cancer tissue and autologous reference tissue were collected from 176 patients who underwent surgery for colon cancer. Assays for quantifying ERK, AKT, cyclin d and p70s6k proteins were developed using single molecule array (Simoa). KRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutation status was determined using droplet digital PCR.\n\nResultsPatients with BRAF mutations had decreased concentrations of ERK (p=0.0002), AKT (p=0.00004) and cyclin d (p=0.001) while no significant differences were found between patients with KRAS mutations and Wild type (Wt) patients. None of the investigated protein concentrations were associated with disease free survival or overall survival, if including all patients. However, when stratifying according to mutation status, significant correlations to overall survival were seen for patients with BRAF mutations and AKT (p=0.003) or ERK (p=0.046) and for patients with KRAS mutations and p70s6k (p=0.04). Furthermore, the combination of genetic mutations, stage 2 disease, and all of the investigated pathway proteins showed significant correlations to overall survival.\n\nConclusionsThere is a strong correlation between pathway protein concentrations and mutational BRAF status. Overall survival in colon cancer patients depend both on gene mutation status and pathway protein concentrations. As significant correlations were found between BRAF mutations and ERK, AKT and cyclin d, concentration measurements of these pathway proteins might be useful as screening for upstream mutations.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.