Back

Reach and Grasp Altered in Pantomime String-Pulling: A Test of the Action/Perception Theory in a Bilateral Reaching Task

Singh, S.; Mandziak, A.; Barr, K.; Blackwell, A. A.; Mohajerani, M. H.; Wallace, D. G.; Whishaw, I. Q.

2019-06-24 neuroscience
10.1101/679811 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The action/perception theory of cortical organization is supported by the finding that pantomime hand movements of reaching and grasping are different from real movements. Frame-by-frame video analysis and MATLAB(R) based tracking examined real/pantomime differences in a bilaterally movement, string-pulling, pulling down a rope with hand-over-hand movements. Sensory control of string-pulling varied from visually-direct when cued, visually-indirect when non cued and somatosensory controlled in the absence of vision. Cued grasping points were visual tracked and the pupils dilated in anticipation of the grasp, but when noncued, visual tracking and pupil responses were absent. In real string-pulling, grasping and releasing the string featured an arpeggio movement in which the fingers close and open in the sequence 5 through 1 (pinki first, thumb last); in pantomime, finger order was reversed, 1 through 5. In real string-pulling, the hand is fully opened and closed to grasp and release; in pantomime, hand opening was attenuated and featured a gradual opening centered on the grasp. The temporal structure of arm movements in real string-pulling featured up-arm movements that were faster than down-arm movement. In pantomime, up/down movements had similar speed. In real string-pulling, up/down arm movements were direct and symmetric; in pantomime, they were more circular and asymmetric. That pantomime string-pulling featured less motoric and temporal complexity than real string-pulling is discussed in relation to the action/perception theory and in relation to the idea that pantomimed string-pulling may feature the substitution of gestures for real movement.\n\nSignificant StatementMost laboratory studies investigating hand movements made by humans feature single hand movements, the current study presents a novel string-pulling task to study bimanual coordination of left and right hands in real and pantomime conditions. The results show that pantomime string-pulling featured less motoric and temporal complexity than real string-pulling. These findings are relevant to the contemporary theory of action and perception that the dorsal stream (parietal cortex) is related to actions and the ventral stream (temporal cortex) is related to perception.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.8%
3
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.7%
6
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.1%
8
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
9
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
10
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
12
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.9%
20
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%