Back

Rituximab treatment for IgA vasculitis: A systematic review

Chamorro, A. J.; Carbonell, C.; Miron-Canelo, J.-A.; Diez-Ruiz, S.; Marcos, M.

2019-06-19 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/676908 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjetivesImmunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgAV) is an inflammatory disease with a controversial treatment based in corticosteroids as first line. To review cases of patients with IgA vasculitis (IgAV) treated with rituximab (RTX) and assess disease characteristics, treatment efficacy and safety.\n\nMethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus, selecting articles with information on IgAV and RTX treatment up to February 2019, with no language limitations. We extracted data on patient characteristics, disease evolution, treatment safety and efficacy. We created a database and analyzed it using statistical software package SPSS v 22.0.\n\nResultsWe extracted clinical data for 43 IgAV patients treated with RTX. Distribution by sex was similar, and the median age at diagnosis was 16 (range 2 months to 70 years). The majority of patients were diagnosed at a pediatric age (24 patients under 18, 55.81%). The time of disease evolution until RTX administration greatly varied. An important number of patients suffered renal complications (86%) before RTX treatment. The frequency of adverse effects from RTX was low (7%, hypersensitivity with no treatment interruption). In terms of disease evolution, 41 patients (95.3%) presented clinical improvement, 15 patients had recurrence after initial remission (34.9%) and 34 patients (79.1%) achieved full remission after completing treatment. None of the patients treated with RTX and included in our systematic review died.\n\nConclusionsRTX is efficacious in patients with IgAV. A high percentage of patients achieved complete remission with a favorable safety profile.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.