Strategies for Integrating Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Results With Multiple Species
Hart, R. P.
Show abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) is a robust technology for parsing gene expression in individual cells from a tissue or other complex source. One application involves experiments where cells from multiple species are recovered from a single sample, such as when human cells are transplanted into an animal model. We transplanted microglial precursor cells into newborn mouse brain and then recovered unenriched cortical tissue six months later. Dissociated cells were assessed by scRNAseq. The default method for analyzing these results begins by aligning sequencing reads with a mixture of both mouse and human reference genomes. While this clearly identifies the human cells as a distinct cluster, the clustering is artificially driven by expression from non-comparable gene identifiers from different species. We devised a method for translating expression counts from human to mouse and evaluated four algorithms for parsing mixed-species scRNAseq data. Our optimal approach split raw sequencing reads according to the best alignment score in each genome, and then re-aligned reads only with the appropriate genome. After gene symbol translation, pooled results indicate that cell types are more appropriately clustered and that differential expression analysis identifies species-specific patterns. This method should be applicable to any mixed-species scRNAseq experiment.\n\nSummary of optimal strategyO_LIMixed-species scRNAseq data are aligned with mixture of mouse and human reference genomes\nC_LIO_LIThe BAM file is scanned to find the best alignment score for each sequencing read identifier; these are used to split the paired FASTQ files into two sets of files\nC_LIO_LIEach set of species-specific, paired FASTQ files is re-aligned with only the appropriate reference genome\nC_LIO_LIRaw counts imported into Seurat\nC_LIO_LIThe human counts table is translated to mouse gene symbols using a custom HomoloGene translation table\nC_LIO_LIResults are merged and analyzed\nC_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurately estimating pathway activity in single cells for clustering and differential analysis 95%
- NS-Forest: A machine learning method for the objective identification of minimum marker gene combinations for cell type determination from single cell RNA sequencing 94%
- Alignment of single-cell RNA-seq samples without over-correction using kernel density matching 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How many markers are needed to robustly determine a cell's type? 92%
- Nanopore sequencing unveils the complexity of the cold-activated murine brown adipose tissue transcriptome 92%
- GeneSurfer Enables Transcriptome-wide Exploration and Functional Annotation of Gene Co-expression Modules in 3D Spatial Transcriptomics Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-throughput gene expression analysis with TempO-LINC sensitively resolves complex brain, lung and kidney heterogeneity at single-cell resolution 95%
- Singletrome: A method to analyze and enhance the transcriptome with long noncoding RNAs for single cell analysis 93%
- Transcriptome profiling of mouse samples using nanopore sequencing of cDNA and RNA molecules 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.