Back

Precise implantation of super-paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles in hippocampus with external rotating magnetic field (RMF) produces rapid antidepressent effects in mice

Chi, Y.; Wenwen, C.; Mengqin, X.; Jingyi, D.; JF, S.

2019-06-10 neuroscience
10.1101/665315 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTMS is an effective anti-depression method commonly used in clinical practice, but it also faces the problems of low spatial resolution, treatment parameters to be optimized and limitation in mechanism research.\n\nObjectiveTo develop a precise magnetic stimulation anti-depression method for the scientific research of magnetic stimulation, especially the mechanism research in animal experiments.\n\nMethodsThe cytotoxicity test was conducted in advance to ensure the security of intervention from SPIO nanoparticles and RMF. In animal experiments, 300nl SPIO solution was injected into the right hippocampus of the CUMS model mice, and then treated experimental group mice with rotating magnetic field for five days. The Sucrose Preference Test (SPT), the Forced Swim Test (FST) and BDNF expression levels were used to evaluate the antidepressant effect of this method.\n\nResultsNo significant decrease of cell viability was observed when the iron concentration is between 52.2{micro}g/ml and 208.8{micro}g/ml. And the application of RMF with a certain frequency was considered to be safe in the cytotoxicity test. When treated with SPIO+RMF, the sucrose preference of SPIO+RMF group mice increased markedly (n=9, p<0.01 vs. CUMS), the FST immobile time reduced (n=8, P<0.05 vs. CUMS) and the BDNF level in the hippocampus was significantly up-regulated (n=5, P<0.01 vs. CUMS). However, merely SPIO intervention failed to be effective.\n\nConclusionswhen intervened with external rotating magnetic field, the SPIO nanoparticles injected into the right hippocampus could produce rapid antidepressent effects in mice.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.