Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing of Cerebrospinal Fluid for the Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Infections: A Multicentre Prospective Study
Fan, S.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Shi, J.; Zou, Y.; Zhao, W.; Qiao, X.; Wang, C.; Chin, J. H.; Liu, L.; Qin, L.; Wang, S.; Li, H.; Yue, W.; Zhang, W.; Li, X.; Ge, Y.; Wu, H.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Guan, T.; Li, S.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, G.; Liu, Z.; Piao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ren, C.; Cui, L.; Liu, C.; Ren, H.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, S.; Jiang, H.; Wang, J.; Bu, H.; Guo, S.; Peng, B.; Cui, L.; Li, W.; Guan, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundInfectious encephalitis and meningitis are often treated empirically without identification of the causative pathogen. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a high throughput technology that enables the detection of pathogens independent of prior clinical or laboratory information.\n\nMethodsThe present study was a multicentre prospective evaluation of mNGS of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for the diagnosis of suspected central nervous system infections.\n\nResultsA total of 276 patients were enrolled in this study between Jan 1, 2017 and Jan 1, 2018. Identification of an etiologic pathogen in CSF by mNGS was achieved in 101 patients (36.6%). mNGS detected 11 bacterial species, 7 viral species, 2 fungal species, and 2 parasitic species. The five leading positive detections were varicella-zoster virus (17), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (14), herpes simplex virus 1 (12), Epstein-Barr virus (12), and Cryptococcus neoformans (7). False positives occurred in 12 (4.3%) patients with bacterial infections known to be widespread in hospital environments. False negatives occurred in 16 (5.8%) patients and included bacterial, viral and fungal aetiologies.\n\nConclusionsmNGS of CSF is a powerful diagnostic method to identify the pathogen for many central nervous system infections.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metagenomic sequencing as a clinical diagnostic tool for infectious diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Assessment of the Clinical Utility of Plasma Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in a Pediatric Hospital Population 92%
- Universal PCR for Bacteria, Mycobacteria, and Fungi: A 10-year Retrospective Review of Clinical Indications and Patient Outcomes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebrospinal fluids from healthy pregnant women does not harbor a detectable microbial community 93%
- Evaluation of flow cytometry for cell count and detection of bacteria in biological fluids. 93%
- Evaluating the feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity of next-generation molecular methods for pleural infection diagnosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Translating metagenomics into clinical practice of complex paediatric neurological presentations 96%
- Comparison between mid-nasal swabs and buccal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in mild COVID-19 patients 92%
- Quantification and prognostic significance of interferon-γ secreting SARS-CoV-2 responsive T cells in hospitalised patients with acute COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- PathCrisp : An Innovative Molecular Diagnostic Tool for Early Detection of NDM-Resistant Infections 91%
- Direct diagnostic testing of SARS-CoV-2 without the need for prior RNA extraction. 91%
- Diagnostic Performance and Characteristics of Anterior Nasal Collection for the SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test: A Prospective Study in Japan 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Field performance of NowCheck rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 in Kisumu County, western Kenya 91%
- Diagnostic performance of multiplex lateral flow tests in ambulatory patients with acute respiratory illness 90%
- Retrospective Clinical Evaluation of Four Lateral Flow Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.