Back

The pharmacodynamic inoculum effect from the perspective of bacterial population modeling

Baeder, D. Y.; Regoes, R. R.

2020-05-12 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/550368 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The quantitative determination of the effects of antimicrobials is essential for our understanding of pharmacodynamics and for their rational clinical application. Common pharmacodynamic measures of antimicrobial efficacy, such as the MIC and the pharmacodynamic function, fail to capture the observed dependence of efficacy on the bacterial population size -- a phenomenon called inoculum effect. We assessed the relationship between bacterial inoculum size and pharmacodynamic relationship and determined the consequences of the inoculum effect on bacterial population dynamics with a mathematical multi-hit model that explicitly describes the interaction between antimicrobial molecules with their targets on the bacterial cells. Our model showed that the inoculum effect can arise from the binding dynamics of antimicrobial molecules to bacterial targets alone. A pharmacodynamic function extended by the inoculum effect on its parameters was able to predict the long-term population dynamics of simple scenrios well. More complex scenarios, however, were only captured with by the mechanistically more explicit multi-hit model. In simulations with competing antimicrobial-susceptible and -resistant bacteria, neglecting the inoculum effect led to an overestimation of the competitive ability of the resistant strain. Our work underpins the importance of including the inoculum effect into quantitative pharmacodynamic frameworks, and provides approaches to accomplish that.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
54.1%
50% of probability mass above
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
3
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
6
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.9%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
9
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
10
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.3%
13
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
14
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
15
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
16
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
19
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%