Back

Synthetic chromosome fusion: effects on genome structure and function

Luo, J.; Vale-Silva, L. A.; Raghavan, A. R.; Mercy, G.; Heldrich, J.; Sun, X.; Li, M.; Zhang, W.; Agmon, N.; Yang, K.; Cai, J.; Stracquadanio, G.; Thierry, A.; Zhao, Y.; Coelho, C.; Lauer, S.; Ahn, J. Y.; Adoff, G.; D'Avino, A.; Berger, H.; Chen, Y.; Chickering, M.; Fishman, O.; Greeno, R. V.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.; Lim, H. S.; Im, J.; Meyer, L.; Moyer, A.; Annadanam, S.; Murphy, N. A.; Natov, P.; Nimer, M.; Radley, A.; Tripathy, A.; Wang, T.; Wilkerson, N.; Zheng, T.; Zhou, V.; Zeller, K.; Kaback, D. B.; Bader, J. S.; Mitchell, L. A.; Mozziconacci, J.; Koszul, R.; Hochwagen, A.; Boeke, J. D.

2023-08-10 synthetic biology
10.1101/381137 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As part of the Synthetic Yeast 2.0 (Sc2.0) project, we designed and synthesized synthetic chromosome I. The total length of synI is [~]21.4% shorter than wild-type chromosome I, the smallest chromosome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. SynI was designed for attachment to another synthetic chromosome due to concerns of potential instability and karyotype imbalance. We used a variation of a previously developed, robust CRISPR-Cas9 method to fuse chromosome I to other chromosome arms of varying length: chrIXR (84kb), chrIIIR (202kb) and chrIVR (1Mb). All fusion chromosome strains grew like wild-type so we decided to attach synI to synIII. Through the investigation of three-dimensional structures of fusion chromosome strains, unexpected loops and twisted structures were formed in chrIII-I and chrIX-III-I fusion chromosomes, which depend on silencing protein Sir3. These results suggest a previously unappreciated 3D interaction between HMR and the adjacent telomere. We used these fusion chromosomes to show that axial element Red1 binding in meiosis is not strictly chromosome size dependent even though Red1 binding is enriched on the three smallest chromosomes in wild-type yeast, and we discovered an unexpected role for centromeres in Red1 binding patterns.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
12.1%
2
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.3%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Chromosome Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.8%
9
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
11
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Biology of the Cell
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%