Gut microbiome and plasma metabolic signatures of one-carbon metabolism differentiate oedematous and non-oedematous severe acute malnutrition
Robertson, R. C.; Edens, T. J.; Baharmand, I.; Varankovich, N.; Dumbura, C.; Panchal, M.; Mutasa, K.; Ntozini, R.; Chasekwa, B.; Mwakamui, S.; Francis, F.; Besa, E.; Runodamoto, T.; Ngosa, D.; Majo, F. D.; Zyambo, K.; Bourke, C. D.; Rukobo, S.; Govha, M.; Amadi, B.; Nathoo, K.; Bwakura-Dangarembizi, M.; Swann, J. R.; Kelly, P.; Manges, A. R.; Prendergast, A. J.; HOPE-SAM study team,
Show abstract
Childhood severe acute malnutrition (SAM) occurs as either classical wasting (non-oedematous-SAM; NO-SAM) or with the presence of oedema (oedematous SAM; O-SAM). Both forms of SAM have distinct mortality and nutritional recovery rates, however, the underlying pathophysiology is poorly understood. We collected stool for whole metagenome shotgun sequencing and plasma for metabolic phenotyping from 238 children (79 NO-SAM, 159 O-SAM) hospitalised with complicated SAM and 141 adequately-nourished controls (ANC) from an observational, prospective cohort in Zimbabwe and Zambia. Children with SAM were followed up at 12-, 24- and 48-weeks post-discharge. During hospitalisation, there were significant alterations in taxonomic and functional microbiome diversity between O-SAM and NO-SAM. Lancefieldella parvula, a potent producer of hydrogen-sulfide from cysteine, was one of three species significantly elevated in O-SAM versus NO-SAM. Metagenomic analysis showed an overabundance of pathways involved in sulfur amino-acid and one-carbon metabolism in O-SAM compared to NO-SAM. Consistently, the sulfur amino acids cysteine and homocysteine were significantly depleted in the plasma of O-SAM versus NO-SAM, while histidine and various phosphatidylcholines were more abundant. During follow-up, O-SAM and NO-SAM microbiomes remained divergent up to 24 weeks post-discharge whilst alpha diversity recovery was delayed in NO-SAM. Plasma metabolomes also remained significantly different between O-SAM, NO-SAM and ANC throughout 48 weeks of follow-up. These findings demonstrate that distinct microbiome profiles may drive disturbance of systemic one-carbon metabolism in O-SAM and highlight persistent microbiome and metabolic dysfunction during nutritional recovery. This work supports further studies targeting the gut microbiome to correct metabolic disturbances and improve long-term clinical outcomes in complicated SAM. One Sentence SummaryChildren hospitalised with oedematous versus non-oedematous severe acute malnutrition have altered gut microbiomes and disrupted one-carbon metabolism, which remain distinct up to 48 weeks post-discharge.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut Microbiome Predicts Clinically Important Improvement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis 94%
- Interactions between the gut microbiome and host gene regulation in cystic fibrosis 93%
- Systemic Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals Interferon Response Heterogeneity and Links Lipid Metabolism to Immune Alterations in Severe COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Necrotizing enterocolitis is preceded by increased gut bacterial replication, Klebsiella, and fimbriae-encoding bacteria that may stimulate TLR4 receptors 94%
- 3D mapping of host-parasite-microbiome interactions reveals metabolic determinants of tissue tropism and disease tolerance in Chagas disease 93%
- Prostaglandin E2 promotes intestinal inflammation via inhibiting microbiota-dependent regulatory T cells 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Two microbiota subtypes identified in Irritable Bowel Syndrome with distinct responses to the low FODMAP diet 93%
- Multiple indicators of gut dysbiosis predict all-cause and cause-specific mortality in solid organ transplant recipients 92%
- Specific gut pathobionts escape antibody coating and are enriched during flares in patients with severe Crohn's disease 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.