Back

Effects of a preconception lifestyle intervention on cardiorespiratory fitness and glycaemic outcomes in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: Secondary findings from the BEFORE THE BEGINNING randomised controlled trial

Sujan, M. A. J.; Skarstad, H. M. S.; Rosvold, G.; Lund, H. N.; Oladewa, A. P.; Fougner, S. L.; Follestad, T.; Salvesen, K. A.; Moholdt, T.

2025-11-27 primary care research
10.1101/2025.11.25.25340951 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesObesity rates are rising globally, and many females of reproductive age are physically inactive, which negatively affect future maternal and neonatal health. In this secondary analysis, we determined the effect of a combined preconception lifestyle intervention on cardiorespiratory fitness and glycaemic outcomes after 7 weeks. MethodsIn the BEFORE THE BEGINNING randomised controlled trial, we randomised females who were at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus and planning pregnancy 1:1 to intervention or control. The intervention consisted of time-restricted eating (TRE) and exercise training and spanned from inclusion preconception throughout pregnancy. TRE involved restricting energy intake to [≤] 10-h/day on [≥] 5 days per week. Exercise volume was based on a heart-rate-based metric (Personal Activity Intelligence, PAI), with the goal of [≥] 100 weekly PAI-points. The main outcomes of interest in this secondary analysis were cardiorespiratory fitness and glycaemic outcomes after 7 weeks of intervention in the preconception period. ResultsAmong 167 randomised participants, we included 166 in the intention-to-treat analysis. After 7 weeks of intervention, there was no between-group difference in relative VO2peak (0.8 mLkg-1min-1; 95% CI -0.2 to 1.9, P = 0.10) or glucose area under the curve (0.0 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval, CI -0.1 to 0.2, P = 0.76). ConclusionWe found no evidence of effects of 7 weeks of combined TRE and exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness or glycaemic outcomes in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.