Back

Association between potentially inappropriate medication use and all-cause mortality among older adults with dyslipidemia: a nationwide cohort study

Lee, S.; Han, S.

2025-11-25 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.11.23.25340838 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPotentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are known to be associated with adverse outcomes in older adults, yet evidence among those with dyslipidemia--who often experience polypharmacy--remains limited. MethodsWe conducted a nationwide, retrospective cohort study in South Korea using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) claims linked to national death records. Adults aged [&ge;]65 years with [&ge;]2 dyslipidemia diagnoses between January and June 2018 were classified as exposed to PIMs per the Drug Utilization Review (DUR) list and followed from a landmark date (July 1, 2018) through June 30, 2024 for all-cause mortality. The primary objective was to compare mortality between the PIM and non-PIM groups; comparisons were conducted using an unadjusted Cox model, an adjusted Cox model, and a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort (propensity scores estimated via logistic regression including all baseline covariates). Balance was assessed using standardized mean differences, and proportional hazards were checked with scaled Schoenfeld residuals. ResultsOf 943,332 participants, 1.7% received at least one potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) at baseline. Over 6 years, the Kaplan-Meier cumulative mortality was 14.2% in the PIM group versus 11.9% in the non-PIM group (absolute risk difference, 2.3 percentage points; relative risk, 1.19). PIM exposure was significantly associated with increased six-year all-cause mortality risk in both propensity score-matched (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.19) and multivariable-adjusted analyses (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15; both p < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, compared with a single PIM, multiple PIMs showed a numerically higher but non-significant risk (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.79-1.56). ConclusionsAmong older adults with dyslipidemia, PIM prescriptions were associated with a 12% increased risk of all-cause mortality in the PSM cohort. These findings support cautious prescribing and regular medication reviews to minimize risk in this high-risk population.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
2
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
7
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%