Back

Mechanistic insights into microbiome-dependent and personalized responses to dietary fibre in a randomized controlled trial

Armet, A. M.; Li, F.; Deehan, E. C.; Nikolaeva, D. D.; Delannoy-Bruno, O.; Siegwald, L.; Berger, B.; Minehira Castelli, K.; Rodionov, D. A.; Arzamasov, A. A.; Liu, J.; Seethaler, B.; Cole, J. L.; Nguyen, K. N.; Jin, M.; Zhao, Y.-Y.; Sharma, A. M.; Curtis, J. M.; Proctor, S. D.; Bischoff, S. C.; Wismer, W. V.; Osterman, A.; Bakal, J. A.; Greiner, R.; Field, C. J.; Knights, D.; Prado, C. M.; Walter, J.

2025-11-21 nutrition
10.1101/2025.11.20.25340625 medRxiv
Show abstract

Dietary fiber supplementation can reduce cardiometabolic risk, but its effective use is limited by incomplete understanding of fibre-microbiome interactions and highly individualized responses. We tested acacia gum (AG; fermentable fibre), resistant starch type 4 (RS4; fermentable fibre), and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC; non-fermentable control fibre) in a six-week randomized trial in adults with excess body weight. Multi-omics profiling revealed distinct, structure-specific microbiota and short-chain fatty acid shifts with AG and RS4, which were not directly linked to physiological outcomes. Improvements in inflammation, gut barrier function, and satiety occurred across all arms, indicating fermentation-independent effects. AG reduced plasma ghrelin, linked to microbial carbohydrate-active enzyme genes targeting its structures. Machine-learning models predicted individualized, fiber-specific effects on blood pressure (AG) and C-reactive protein (RS4) from microbial pathways and fecal bile acids. These findings delineate fermentation-dependent and independent mechanisms of fibre action and provide a mechanistic basis for personalized fibre supplementation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02322112

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.