Back

The Effect of Intravenous Dexamethasone in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block at Halibet National Referral Hospital, Eritrea 2024 - 2025: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Mengistu, M. B.; Habtu, S. A.; Elias, A. M.; Idris, S. H.; Abraha, K. H.

2025-11-24 anesthesia
10.1101/2025.11.19.25340608 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPostoperative pain significantly impacts recovery and healthcare costs. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB) offers effective regional anesthesia but has limited duration. However, dexamethasone may enhance and prolong analgesia when used as an adjunct. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effective of dexamethasone added to bupivacaine in prolonging postoperative analgesia. MethodA randomized clinical trial was conducted at Halibet National Referral Hospital, Eritrea, involving 60 patients undergoing upper limb surgery. Group A received 0.5% bupivacaine (20 ml) with 2 ml normal saline; Group B received 0.5% bupivacaine (20 ml) with 2 ml (8 mg) intravenous dexamethasone. Pain scores, time to first rescue analgesia, and analgesic consumption were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS v26. ResultsThe mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer in the dexamethasone group (17.36 {+/-} 3.75 hours) compared to the control group (7.57 {+/-} 1.04 hours, p < 0.001). The dexamethasone group had faster onset of sensory and motor block and lower analgesic consumption. ConclusionsThe addition of 8 mg intravenous dexamethasone to 0.5% bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks significantly prolonged postoperative analgesia, accelerated the onset of sensory and motor block, and reduced analgesic consumption. This combination offers a safe, effective, and practical enhancement to regional anesthesia for upper limb surgeries. Trial registrationPACTR202509579633417 (retrospectively registered on 11 September 2025)

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.