The effect of BCG vaccination on adult mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Schaltz-Buchholzer, F.; Curtis, N.; Diacon, A. H.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E. J.; Kotsaki, A.; Rosendahl Madsen, A. M.; Messina, N. L.; Nhamussua, L.; Nielsen, S.; Pittet, L. F.; Silva, I.; Sparrow, A.; Upton, C.; van Werkhoeven, C. H.; Netea, M. G.; Stabell Benn, C.; Aaby, P.
Show abstract
ObjectivesBacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), similar to some other live vaccines, may offer partial protection against unrelated infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several trials tested whether BCG provides protection against COVID-19. DesignMeta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials which provided mortality data. SettingHigh-income settings as well as low- and middle-income settings (LMICs). ParticipantsTrial populations were healthcare workers (HCW) or individuals of older age, followed for 6-12 months. InterventionsBCG vaccine versus placebo. Main outcome measureOverall mortality and COVID-19 mortality. ResultsNine of the 15 RCTs reported at least one death. Trial populations were healthcare workers (4 RCTs) or individuals of older age (5 RCTs), in Europe (5 RCTs) or LMICs (4 RCTs) with a total of 8,169 participants randomly allocated to BCG (18 deaths) and 8,176 to placebo (37 deaths). In a meta-analysis, receiving BCG vs placebo was associated with a 51% (95% CI: 15 to72%) reduction in all-cause mortality. The all-cause mortality RRR was 78% (-3 to 95%) in HCWs (Europe and LMICs) and 43% (95% CI: -6 to 69%) in the elderly. It was 37% (95 CI: -15 to 66%) in Europe and 90% (95% CI: 22 to 99%) in LMICs. The relative reduction of deaths (6 BCG; 12 placebo) from COVID-19 was 50% (95 CI: -33 to 81). ConclusionsBCG may have reduced all-cause mortality in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-specific effects of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 96%
- Effectiveness of the WHO-authorized Covid-19 Vaccines: a Rapid Review of Global Reports till June 30, 2021 94%
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529): A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post-marketing active surveillance of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in persons aged 12-39 years in Italy: a multi-database, self-controlled case series study 92%
- Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine NVX-CoV2373 in Younger and Older Adults 92%
- Information nudges for influenza vaccination: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and Covid-19 hospitalization among Finnish elderly and chronically ill – An interim analysis of a nationwide cohort study 93%
- Durability of mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 in the time of Delta: Interim results from an observational cohort study 92%
- A Systematic Review on Malaria and Tuberculosis (TB) Vaccine Challenges in Sub-Saharan African Clinical Trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of CoronaVac on Covid-19 outcomes of elderly adults in a large and socially unequal Brazilian city: A target trial emulation study 93%
- Averted mortality by COVID-19 vaccination in Belgium between 2021 and 2023 93%
- Quality and methodological heterogeneity of COVID-19 vaccine safety studies focusing on the myocarditis safety signal: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Facing the Omicron variant – How well do vaccines protect against mild and severe COVID-19? Third interim analysis of a living systematic review 95%
- Nationwide Effectiveness of First and Second SARS-CoV2 Booster Vaccines during the Delta and Omicron Pandemic Waves in Hungary (HUN-VE 2 Study) 94%
- Activate-2: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial Of Bcg Vaccination Against Covid19 In Individuals At Risk 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.