Back

Effects of a suspension training warm-up on cardiopulmonary exercise performance in recreationally active college-aged adults: a randomized crossover study protocol

Federico, R. J.; Caba Abreu, T. A.; Pigman, J.; Rial Rebullido, T.

2025-11-17 sports medicine
10.1101/2025.11.16.25340334 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesThis study will aim to assess the acute cardiopulmonary differences of a treadmill walking warm{square}up (WW) versus a suspension warm{square}up (SW) immediately preceding cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in recreationally active college{square}aged adults. The primary outcomes will be to assess differences in peak oxygen consumption, peak heart rate, and peak minute ventilation during CPET following a WW versus a SW. Secondary outcomes will include time to exhaustion, rate of perceived exertion, blood pressure, tidal volume, fraction of expired oxygen consumption, and respiration rate. MethodsThis study will be a randomized counterbalanced crossover design. Participants will complete two separate CPETs over two non{square}consecutive test days ([≥]48{square}h, [≤]7{square}d). During each visit, participants will complete either a WW (6{square}min at self{square}selected pace on a treadmill, 0% grade) or SW (6{square}min dynamic sequence of suspension training exercises), followed by an incremental treadmill CPET protocol up to maximal exertion. Gas exchange, heart rate, blood pressure, and rate of perceived exertion will be measured at rest, after warm-up, during CPET protocol, immediately after, and after 5 minutes of resting. Analyses will use linear mixed-effects models and two one-sided tests for equivalence. ConclusionsThis protocol will determine whether a brief, dynamic suspension training warm{square}up is a practical and transferable approach or rather different from a traditional treadmill warm-up before CPET in active young adults. Ethics/registrationIRB SP2553 (June 25, 2025), clinical trials Identifier: NCT07215052.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
32.8%
2
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
5
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
7
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
12
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
21
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%